LFCNeil90 Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina - 7 Kromkamp - 8 MOMCarragher - 7Hyypia - 7Traore - 7 Kewell - 7 Hamman - 7Gerrard - 8Cisse - 7Fowler - 6Crouch 6 Riise - 7Alonso - 7Morientes didnt have time
_00_deathscar Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina 7Kromkamp 8Carragher 8Hyypia 7Traore 7Cisse 7Hamann 6.5Gerrard 8Kewell 8.5Fowler 7Crouch 6.5 Riise 7Alonso 7.5
jariiiiiiiiiise Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina - 7Kromkamp - 7Carragher - 8Hyypia - 7Traore - 4Kewell - 9Hamman - 7Gerrard - 8Cisse - 7Fowler - 7Crouch 7 Riise - 7Alonso - 8
Cisse Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina 7Kromkamp 9, MOMCarra 8Sami 7Djimi 7Cisse 7.5Stevie 8Didi 6.5Kewell 7Fowler 5Crouch 6.5 JAR 6Xabi 7 We turn every goalie into Gordon Banks, so tedious
Nebraska Red Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina - 7Kromkamp - 8Carragher - 7Hyypia - 7Traore - 6Kewell - 7Hamman - 5Gerrard - 7Cisse - 5Fowler -6Crouch 6 Riise - 6Alonso -7
Bootle Buck Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina - 7 Kromkamp - 7.5Carragher - 7Hyypia - 7Traore - 6 Kewell - 6 Hamman - 7Gerrard - 8Cisse - 6Fowler - 6Crouch 6 Riise - 6Alonso - 6.5Morientes didnt have time
Morgul Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina 7 Kromkamp 8Carragher 7Hyypiä 7Traore 6 Kewell 7Hamann 6Gerrard 7+Cissé 7 Fowler 6Crouch 6 Riise 7Alonso 7
redjersey Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina - 7Kromkamp - 7Carragher - 8Hyypia - 7Traore - 4Kewell - 9Hamman - 7Gerrard - 8Cisse - 7Fowler - 7Crouch 7 Riise - 7Alonso - 8 Kromkamp was my MOM but I don't think he was worth more than a 7. 6 for the rest. A very average performance.
ajit Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Reina 7 Kromkamp 8 - could give finnan a run for his moneyCarragher 7Hyypiä 7Traore 5 -just cos he keeps scaring the crap out of me Kewell 7Hamann 6Gerrard 7Cissé 7 Fowler 6Crouch 6 Riise 7Alonso 7
_00_deathscar Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Where are all these ratings for Traore lower than 6 coming from?
Frosty Jack Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Cisse had a good game, forced 3 good saves, put a lot of crosses in, why the sixes?
Frosty Jack Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 Lack of finishing and general s***tery. Lack of finishing? he was on target a couple of times, and his crossing was generally good, got the better of his marker as the game went on, and created chances, what exactly was he supposed to do? he's getting blamed for the offside, from what i saw, his upper body was marginally, but his feet were on the line, and according to the rule, he wasn't interfering with play anyway. I said the same thing last time he was played on the wing, if we had signed Victor in January and he put in that performance, the analysis would be completely different on here.
Guest chiael Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 Reina 7Kromkamp 8Carragher 8Hyypia 7Traore 7Cisse 7Hamann 6.5Gerrard 8Kewell 8.5Fowler 7Crouch 6.5 Riise 7Alonso 7.5 As long as it's Traore, it's going to be a poor performance. Did he score an own goal , gave the ball away in the penalty area or made Reina the star or was I watching a different game ? I'm not saying he did great. But a 4 is really under the belt. Gez
Nerik Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 Reina 6.5Kromkamp 7Carra 7Sami 6.5Traore 6Kewell 6.5Didi 6.5Gerrard 6.5Cisse 6.5Fowler 6Crouch 6 Subs Riise 6Nando 6Alonso 6.5
_00_deathscar Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 Lack of finishing? he was on target a couple of times, and his crossing was generally good, got the better of his marker as the game went on, and created chances, what exactly was he supposed to do? he's getting blamed for the offside, from what i saw, his upper body was marginally, but his feet were on the line, and according to the rule, he wasn't interfering with play anyway. I said the same thing last time he was played on the wing, if we had signed Victor in January and he put in that performance, the analysis would be completely different on here. I'm not denying he had a decent game - but it was a decent game by HIS standards. He also fluffed about 3 or 4 crosses, and failed to beat the full back quite a few times in trying to trick him and f*** up when Kromkamp or Gerrard were behind him, wide open. Not sure if anyone else noticed that. Having said that, I gave him a 7. As long as it's Traore, it's going to be a poor performance. Did he score an own goal , gave the ball away in the penalty area or made Reina the star or was I watching a different game ? I'm not saying he did great. But a 4 is really under the belt. Gez I didn't give him a 4 though.... I suppose you were quoting the wrong person or referring to my response about where the ratings for Traore below 6 are coming from.
jariiiiiiiiiise Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 Where are all these ratings for Traore lower than 6 coming from? was out mustled twice and fell over under no pressure which could have lead to chalton scoring wayward passing forward thats why I gave him a 4
anny road Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 was out mustled twice and fell over under no pressure which could have lead to chalton scoring wayward passing forward thats why I gave him a 4 and your totally wrong Traore played ok yesterday but gets low marks because of who is he is Reina 6Kromkamp 8Hyypia 6Carragher 7Traore 6Cisse 6Gerrard 6Hamann 6Kewell 5Fowler 6Crouch 6 Riise 6Alonso 7
Skillz Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 and your totally wrong Traore played ok yesterday but gets low marks because of who is he isReina 6Kromkamp 8Hyypia 6Carragher 7Traore 6Cisse 6Gerrard 6Hamann 6Kewell 5Fowler 6Crouch 6Riise 6Alonso 7 Surely the same applies here. Harry was in no way a 5 and to rate him as low as that shows you have biased view of his expected performance. What he have to do to get a 6, dominate and score matchwinning goals!
anny road Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 Surely the same applies here. Harry was in no way a 5 and to rate him as low as that shows you have biased view of his expected performance. What he have to do to get a 6, dominate and score matchwinning goals! no I thought Kewell didnt play well at all.....I might be wrong, and I havnt seen the game on TV again I thought he was less of a threat than Cisse.... And I am Kewell fan The reason why I put that about Traore was because he played in back four that gave nothing away....he played at Left back and Centre half and did well enough
Skillz Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 no I thought Kewell didnt play well at all.....I might be wrong, and I havnt seen the game on TV again I thought he was less of a threat than Cisse.... And I am Kewell fan The reason why I put that about Traore was because he played in back four that gave nothing away....he played at Left back and Centre half and did well enough I agree about Traore, thought he looked solid enough at centre half, having said that Charlton had little going forward all night. I watched it twice now (both on TV) thought Harry was very good. I am a fan and am probably biased myself but i would of given him a 7. He had 5 shots on target, 2 off, great interception at the death was important. Went a little quiet for period of the second half when we utilised Cisse a lot due to his getting the better of Spector (looked ok himself and had a good battle with Cisse). Just thought 5 was very harsh.
surf Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 I thought Kewell had a very good game, a lot of the things we created came from him. He looked our likeliest player to score, or provide a goal from a decent cross.
tag Posted March 6, 2006 Posted March 6, 2006 Reina - 7Kromkamp - 8Carragher - 7Hyypia - 7Traore - 6Kewell - 7Hamman - 5Gerrard - 7Cisse - 5Fowler -6Crouch 6Riise - 6Alonso -7 Cisse at 5? Admittedly he was a bit frustating, but i thought he was our best goal-threat. Krompkamp my MOM as well.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now