Parry Out!

[RafaTheGaffa]

Parts of what follows below were actually painful to write. However, because of the ongoing misinformation campaigns launched by Mr. Rick Parry and his spin doctors, I feel it is my duty to write this. I guess I should start by saying that I have a plan to direct your attention in some detail to the vast and irreparable calamity brought upon us by Mr. Parry. I call this plan "Operation present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that relative to just a few years ago, ill-bred practitioners of separatism are nearly ten times as likely to believe that the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions. This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by Mr. Parry to impose amateurish new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of immature drive for power. Sometimes it seems peevish galoots are like a farmer who, in the spring, would work the ground, plant seeds, fertilize, and cultivate the ground for a period of time. And then, perhaps, he decides to go off to Hawaii and have a good time and forget the reason he planted the crop in the first place. Well, a farmer wouldn't do that. But Mr. Parry would convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle if he got the chance.

 

Will the worst kinds of disingenuous freeloaders there are ever fight tooth and nail against Mr. Parry? Don't bet on it. Rest assured, some time ago, in the aftermath of his last volley of attacks, a group of fork-tongued thugs began to destabilize society. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: The acid test for his "kinder, gentler" new crusades should be, "Do they still create a beachhead for organized blackguardism?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that the spectrum of views between diabolism and ageism is not a line but a circle at which impudent hypochondriacs and scabrous freaks meet. To properly place Mr. Parry somewhere in that spectrum, one needs to realize that Mr. Parry's companions all look like Mr. Parry, think like Mr. Parry, act like Mr. Parry, and ransack people's homes, just like Mr. Parry does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha! Put simply, Mr. Parry's propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Mr. Parry's decisions are based on reason" and, "Mr. Parry is beyond reproach". What they don't tell you, though, is that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: Mr. Parry wants his cowardice and irresponsibility to be regarded as prudence. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: Mr. Parry is locked into his present course of destruction. He does not have the interest or the will to change his fundamentally domineering exegeses. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of shabby new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. Allow me to explain. Mr. Parry's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.

 

Mr. Parry uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity. Often, the lure of an articulate new pundit, a well-financed attention-getting program, an effective audience generator, hot new "inside" information, or a professionally produced exposé is irresistible to impractical stool pigeons who want to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to summon up the courage to announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop Mr. Parry before he can represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. I almost forgot: The word "theologicohistorical" is so compromised that I retain it only as a pejorative. In view of that, it is not surprising that there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Mr. Parry and his functionaries started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that I have one itsy-bitsy problem with Mr. Parry's utterances. Videlicet, they create problems that our grandchildren will have to live with. And that's saying nothing about how when he is challenged, Mr. Parry either denies everything or claims that his words were taken out of context and that his enemies are plotting against him. That's the sort of statement that some people claim is addlepated, but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made, because Mr. Parry unquestionably believes that puerile cutthroats are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is he living in? To help answer that question I will offer a single anecdote. A few weeks ago, I overheard some libidinous flibbertigibbet tell everyone who passed by that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing Mr. Parry and the irascible apolaustic-types in his band. Astounded, I asked this person if he realized that Mr. Parry's ballyhoos are so insidious that they are easily taken up and assimilated by aberrent suborners of perjury, whose intellectual level corresponds to the material offered. Not only was his answer "no" but it was also news to him that I certainly suspect that Mr. Parry has a driving need to foment covinous forms of political tyranny. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that he fervently believes that the media should "create" news rather than report it. This shows that he is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that if I had to choose between chopping onions and helping Mr. Parry turn the trickle of Lysenkoism into a tidal wave, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that if I didn't sincerely believe that failure to define our terms more clearly will lead to a deluge of complaints by Mr. Parry's goombahs, then I wouldn't be writing this letter.

 

I'm oversimplifying things a little here, and everyone with half a brain understands that. I unequivocally feel that Mr. Parry's associates are once again out begging for signatures for some tasteless petition that makes it legal for Mr. Parry to waste natural resources. Deal with it. Although he was likely following the dictates of his conscience when he decided to set the hoops through which we all must jump, the fact remains that if his yes-men had even an ounce of integrity, they would seek liberty, equality, and fraternity.

 

Each rung on the ladder of deconstructionism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Mr. Parry to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. That is the standard process by which the worst classes of supercilious geeks I've ever seen supplant one form of injustice with another. If he wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "spinulosodenticulate", for example, and expect us to be scared. So you see, Mr. Rick Parry's trained seals coerce children into becoming activists willing to serve, promote, spy, and fight for his imprecations.

 

[fyds]

Feck me, and I thought I was a bit of a witterer!

[Cunny]

is this a piss take?

[Eiler99]

Someone swallowed a dictionary.

[Tosh]

I think you should check your spelling, Parry is spelled "B-L-A-I-R". Although some more obscure spellings include "C-A-M-E-R-O-N"

 

You're welcome

[WillG]

 

I'm oversimplifying things a little here,

 

[Chili Palmer]

my head hurts...

[anny road]

i'm off for a lie down

[Mike]

looks like a boiler plate text where you change the name yourself

[chiliking]

Effort: 8,5-9,0

Context: 4,5

 

For all eternity, hereafter I prefer the ones shouting "Sack Parry" to this.

[Benitez]

wha?

[Andy Mac]

Wow, see what you get when you use on-line translation services

[G Richards]

That's quite a rant there! Not sure what your point is though. If it's humour then it's too clever for me. If it's meant as proper criticism then it's all over the place.

[fyds]

looks like a boiler plate text where you change the name yourself

I think M'lud, you have nailed it!

[Leo No.8]

Looks to me like the words 'Tony Blair' have been replaced with 'Rick Parry' or something like that.

 

I hope so, if you wrote that mate, even yours truly being renowned for lengthy posts would say you need to get out more...

[RafaTheGaffa]

here

 

[Guest blizztar]

Could someone babelfish this please...

[fyds]

Could someone babelfish this please...

I think they already did...

[Mike E]

Could someone babelfish this please...

 

Ip nip bibble blip.

[fyds]

Ip nip bibble blip.

Much better - nothing like a Bobby Robson interview is there?

[Spion kop]

get this guy in he's killer

[floyd]

Just going to read this so my brain doesn't hurt

 

[Toni]

If he wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "spinulosodenticulate", for example, and expect us to be scared. So you see, Mr. Rick Parry's trained seals coerce children into becoming activists willing to serve, promote, spy, and fight for his imprecations.

 

ironical perhaps?

[Ronnie Whelan]

Non-thread.

[PLY]

You've taken your criticism of Krusty too far , expect a visit from