Jump to content
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I think we look more solid at the back with Bradley playing. He doesn’t stop running, has decent pace and can deliver a decent ball in. Very promising debut for the lad.

  • Like 1
Posted

Fast, aggressive, good on the ball. Said we needed to sign a solid end to end RB who could defend to give us flexibility with Trent. Now we don’t.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Leo No.8 said:

Fast, aggressive, good on the ball. Said we needed to sign a solid end to end RB who could defend to give us flexibility with Trent. Now we don’t.

Yep, a solid backup right-back who does right-back things is exactly what we needed. And here he is.

Posted
2 hours ago, Leo No.8 said:

Fast, aggressive, good on the ball. Said we needed to sign a solid end to end RB who could defend to give us flexibility with Trent. Now we don’t.

Conor's taken quickly 

3 hours ago, stressederic said:

You're going to end up on a list, mate.

That and Shard's Mohamtweak post are reminiscent of the old days....

Supoyb 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
Posted
2 hours ago, Leo No.8 said:

Fast, aggressive, good on the ball. Said we needed to sign a solid end to end RB who could defend to give us flexibility with Trent. Now we don’t.

It’s amazing how we add players to the squad without going to the market and without missing a beat.

If Bradley and Q can make it we would save millions. Plus it’s more fun to see the kids do well.

In this market even backup squad players for CB and RB good enough to play for us could cost big money. 

Hats off to everyone involved and hopefully this means that when we do go to market for players we can go for top shelf studs instead of having to fix multiple holes and divvying up the war chest into smaller amounts.

Do we even need to buy anything this summer then?

Posted

now I Want to see Owen Beck do something similar on the left. Would be very nice if we could rejuvenate the back line from within. 

Who was meant to be more talented between Bradley and Ramsay? 

Posted

Think they’ve always had high hopes for Bradley but the idea was buying Ramsey to be Trent’s back up whilst Ramsey went on loan for a coupe of years. Problem is Ramsey’s been injured since he got here so we’ve had to use Gomez there until now. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Dominus Maximus said:

It’s amazing how we add players to the squad without going to the market and without missing a beat.

If Bradley and Q can make it we would save millions. Plus it’s more fun to see the kids do well.

In this market even backup squad players for CB and RB good enough to play for us could cost big money. 

Hats off to everyone involved and hopefully this means that when we do go to market for players we can go for top shelf studs instead of having to fix multiple holes and divvying up the war chest into smaller amounts.

Do we even need to buy anything this summer then?

Mbappe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...