PhilM Posted yesterday at 09:00 Posted yesterday at 09:00 10 hours ago, Cam said: With Gail playing his mother just to mess him up in a Marty McFly kind of way. To be fair, Marty McFly's mum was FIT. 1 1 1
Cam Posted yesterday at 09:02 Posted yesterday at 09:02 1 hour ago, Kvarme Ate My Food said: Pretty surface level understanding of the issues and chronology there Cam. You are David van Day and I claim my £5.
Kvarme Ate My Food Posted yesterday at 09:06 Posted yesterday at 09:06 3 minutes ago, Cam said: You are David van Day and I claim my £5. Claim your Dollar surely 2 1 4
Cam Posted yesterday at 09:08 Posted yesterday at 09:08 Just now, Kvarme Ate My Food said: Claim your Dollar surely Oh bravo!
Cam Posted yesterday at 11:21 Posted yesterday at 11:21 2 hours ago, PhilM said: To be fair, Marty McFly's mum was FIT. The 80's mainstream Hollywood movies were very sexually confusing - Mummy McFly, Mannequin, Weird Science etc. Probably why Richard Hughes is so useless - damaged his contract-signing hand by w***ing to Daryl Hannah as a fish. 1
D.Boon Posted yesterday at 11:27 Posted yesterday at 11:27 5 minutes ago, Cam said: W***ing to Daryl Hannah as a fish. Incoming! 1
charlie clown Posted yesterday at 11:52 Posted yesterday at 11:52 14 hours ago, kop205 said: It's like that thing with a chicken, a fox and a bag of corn KFC? 1
Gethin Posted yesterday at 11:55 Posted yesterday at 11:55 2 minutes ago, charlie clown said: KFC? On another forum I used to frequent, KFC stood for "Kick in the f-ing <gender appropriate c-word>". As in "That Gary Neville deserves a KFC"
Molby Posted yesterday at 12:11 Posted yesterday at 12:11 lads, brace yourselves for a decade or more of misery Assumption: all 3 leave that’s the only assumption needed cos replacing them would be almost impossible even if money was not an issue
dyl Posted yesterday at 12:16 Posted yesterday at 12:16 53 minutes ago, Cam said: w***ing to Daryl Hannah as a fish. Just like most of this forum then..... 1
épieur Posted yesterday at 13:07 Posted yesterday at 13:07 (edited) 51 minutes ago, dyl said: Just like most of this forum then..... Oh, so this finnomenon extends beyond the forum? Edited yesterday at 13:08 by épieur 1
Murphman Posted yesterday at 13:28 Posted yesterday at 13:28 18 hours ago, Kvarme Ate My Food said: It’s like a verbal reasoning test, the answers are in there but are you smart enough to get an assisted place at St Mary’s in Crosby? You've been missed mate. I've missed you even more since I found out we are related. 2
Cobs Posted yesterday at 13:28 Posted yesterday at 13:28 (edited) 1 hour ago, Molby said: lads, brace yourselves for a decade or more of misery Assumption: all 3 leave that’s the only assumption needed cos replacing them would be almost impossible even if money was not an issue if all 3 stay Mo & Virgil are gonna need replacing sooner or later anyway. So - you can be optimistic about getting good replacements or pessimistic about it your outlook may depend on if you go the match or not, or not Edited yesterday at 13:28 by Cobs 1
Molby Posted yesterday at 15:53 Posted yesterday at 15:53 2 hours ago, Cobs said: if all 3 stay Mo & Virgil are gonna need replacing sooner or later anyway. So - you can be optimistic about getting good replacements or pessimistic about it your outlook may depend on if you go the match or not, or not if all three stay then we have a chance of finding successors over a reasonable period ie 2 seasons if all three leave then we have ZERO chance in 1 (or more) window, the team will collapse and we’ll have to start again
McBain Posted yesterday at 16:04 Posted yesterday at 16:04 We've 15 first team players out of contract between now and 2 summers hence. And a fella in charge who couldn't find water if he fell out of a boat
Cobs Posted yesterday at 16:19 Posted yesterday at 16:19 26 minutes ago, Molby said: if all three stay then we have a chance of finding successors over a reasonable period ie 2 seasons if all three leave then we have ZERO chance in 1 (or more) window, the team will collapse and we’ll have to start again well, that's somewhere between very pessimistic and rubbish 16 minutes ago, McBain said: We've 15 first team players out of contract between now and 2 summers hence. And a fella in charge who couldn't find water if he fell out of a boat and yet the teeny tiny team we got him from sit 5th in the league with a squad he presumably had something to do with building - mad innit? I get his 'work' here has been less than stellar from what we can see looking in but at some stage (presumably the summer) he's gonna have to produce. the idea that we sit tip of the league and champions league whilst being run by people with no idea what they're doing just doesn't stack up for me, Brian. 2
Molby Posted yesterday at 17:01 Posted yesterday at 17:01 38 minutes ago, Cobs said: well, that's somewhere between very pessimistic and rubbish and yet the teeny tiny team we got him from sit 5th in the league with a squad he presumably had something to do with building - mad innit? I get his 'work' here has been less than stellar from what we can see looking in but at some stage (presumably the summer) he's gonna have to produce. the idea that we sit tip of the league and champions league whilst being run by people with no idea what they're doing just doesn't stack up for me, Brian. ask anyone who knows about football say like the type of people who go the game, for instance…… and they’ll all say that under THIS ownership*, if VVD, Trent and and Mo all leave at the end of the season, we’ll be in the wilderness for years * the very parsimonious kind
Cobs Posted yesterday at 18:43 Posted yesterday at 18:43 1 hour ago, Molby said: ask anyone who knows about football I’ll just stop you there with an ‘oh, do feck off’ 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now