Transfer Window Speculation

[Swipe]

1 minute ago, Benzo-13 said:

75m mooted isn’t it.

Does he have a clause? 

Just now, psl said:

For Isak? Be surprised if it's less than 120m.

Yeah if he’s no clause there’s no way he’s going for under 100m. As you say probably well above that. 

[Benzo-13]

7 minutes ago, Swipe said:

Does he have a clause? 

Yeah if he’s no clause there’s no way he’s going for under 100m. As you say probably well above that. 

Yeah there’s been murmurs of a clause of 75m.

Theres no way Arsenal play 120m either.

[PaulMcC186]

25 minutes ago, Ombudsam said:

Certainly not how he’s playing. I do want another superstar in the front line though 

It feels like it’s a shame in the same way it’s a shame we did Haaland. We were never in for him.

Haaland was very expensive. Kvara wasn't 

[Hassony]

5 minutes ago, muleskinner said:

The 'poor league' narrative is bulls*** tbh. We are a very good dude and are cruising to the tile deservedly.

The Brazilian squad includes players from Wolves, Forest and Brighton

City are obviously worse this season,  but the depth in strength in the league is stronger than it has ever been 

[Swipe]

6 minutes ago, Benzo-13 said:

Yeah there’s been murmurs of a clause of 75m.

Theres no way Arsenal play 120m either.

Be a steal that. 

Dunno about Arsenal though. It’s what they really really need. 

He’s one of the best strikers in the world now. I think someone will pay 100m+ if they have to. 

[Ombudsam]

3 minutes ago, PaulMcC186 said:

Haaland was very expensive. Kvara wasn't 

Yeah but we weren’t in for either. That’s my point

1 minute ago, Swipe said:

Be a steal that. 

Dunno about Arsenal though. It’s what they really really need. 

He’s one of the best strikers in the world now. I think someone will pay 100m+ if they have to. 

I think it might turn into my new “We should have signed Kane”.
 

We need to boy some club in the league. We’re about to be champions. f***ing kick some cocky d****eads in the head.

[PaulMcC186]

3 minutes ago, Ombudsam said:

Yeah but we weren’t in for either. That’s my point

We were interested in Haaland but he was too expensive according to Ian Graham. We were interested in Kvara according to Joyce. 

[Swipe]

5 minutes ago, Ombudsam said:

Yeah but we weren’t in for either. That’s my point

I think it might turn into my new “We should have signed Kane”.
 

We need to boy some club in the league. We’re about to be champions. f***ing kick some cocky d****eads in the head.

Yeah was thinking that a few days ago too. Want those two lads at Bournemouth? Go and f***ing get them. Newcastle are tiny compared to Liverpool even if they’re rich, so just go and bully them. 
 

 

[Ombudsam]

1 minute ago, PaulMcC186 said:

We were interested in Haaland but he was too expensive according to Ian Graham. We were interested in Kvara according to Joyce. 

Ok. Well if that’s what is being interested in a player manifests as then God help us. No bid, no reported agent contact. How did we not convince a player to come here instead of a one team league.

[Gethin]

8 minutes ago, Ombudsam said:

Ok. Well if that’s what is being interested in a player manifests as then God help us. No bid, no reported agent contact. How did we not convince a player to come here instead of a one team league.

You realise that in the last 12 hours you've made this argument and one that went “don’t worry, there’s loads of good players out there and they’re all trainable”

[Ombudsam]

6 minutes ago, Gethin said:

You realise that in the last 12 hours you've made this argument and one that went “don’t worry, there’s loads of good players out there and they’re all trainable”

I know but this is more relevant to my relative Isak obsession (although this isn’t entirely just about the player as I want us to assert our dominance). 
 

I just don’t think we were particularly in for this Georgian lad. We would have made a better fist of it. It’s others saying we were.

[Bailo]

52 minutes ago, Swipe said:

Yeah was thinking that a few days ago too. Want those two lads at Bournemouth? Go and f***ing get them. Newcastle are tiny compared to Liverpool even if they’re rich, so just go and bully them. 
 

 

Is there a suggestion Newcastle are after them? 

[kop205]

1 hour ago, Swipe said:

City have f***ed around and found out, but Arsenal haven’t been without a striker all season. We were well ahead of them when they got those injuries. And as Kop says we’re on course for 91 points. A total that would have won the title every single time Arsenal have done it. 

And the season has been really good. Look at the top 4 race. 

Them turning themselves into none of our concern over the last couple of weeks is, well, none of our concern

1 hour ago, Swipe said:

Yeah what city were doing wasn’t normal and fuelled by cheating. Liverpool virtually matching those totals was insane. A team that would have smashed pretty much every other PL winner before it to pieces. 

I've said it loads but us getting mid-high 90s for 3 out 4 seasons is the greatest achievement in the history of the league.

[Swipe]

7 minutes ago, Bailo said:

Is there a suggestion Newcastle are after them? 

Sorry i clumsily was making two points. One about those lads and one about isak. 

[Bailo]

7 minutes ago, Swipe said:

Sorry i clumsily was making two points. One about those lads and one about isak. 

Ah don't worry, I just thought I'd missed some links. Agree with the overall gist of acting our weight. Surely Hughes can sort stuff out with Huijsen and Kerkez fast, announce them after the CL win. 

If Real want to give us £20m to get Trent before the World Club Cup, even better. 

[D.Boon]

1 hour ago, PaulMcC186 said:

We were interested in Haaland but he was too expensive according to Ian Graham. We were interested in Kvara according to Joyce. 

We're interested in all the good players right up to the point of a price being quoted.

Similar to when I walk around a posh hi fi shop

[Owen1978]

I'm jumping ship from Isak to Sesko... He looks like a monster and only 21...

[goodrobotusses]

11 hours ago, Benzo-13 said:

75m mooted isn’t it.

Wonder if that's if they don't make the CL, If there is such a clause.

11 hours ago, psl said:

For Isak? Be surprised if it's less than 120m.

If there is a clause it'll be from the contract he signed when he joined (don't think he's ever renewed), so if true 75m might have sounded like a good number at the time.

[honourablegeorge]

9 minutes ago, goodrobotusses said:

Wonder if that's if they don't make the CL, If there is such a clause.

If there is a clause it'll be from the contract he signed when he joined (don't think he's ever renewed), so if true 75m might have sounded like a good number at the time.

Nah, they paid £63m

Do think he may want to move on if there's no CL

[growler]

How great if there are 5 spots, and Chelsea and city miss out. 

[Tommok]

We should announce we're buying Isak just before the final next Sunday. 

[surf]

1 minute ago, Tommok said:

We should announce we're buying Isak just before the final next Sunday. 

he takes off his newcastle shirt to reveal a liverpool shirt and starts as our centre forward