cocknose Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 hours ago, YugoB said: We're clearly looking to sign Huijsen,Kerkez, and are targeting a 9, at bare minimum, that's a decent amount of money we'd be spending, so let's see what happens. We're getting a chunk of money for winning the league, and whatever money we've gotten in the CL. I agree. Ornstein again on NBC sports reiterating that we want Huijsen,Kerkez, and a centerforward for sure. Have to get another midfielder , have to 1 2
honourablegeorge Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 21 minutes ago, WillG said: Very expensive though Would be about the ninth most expensive left back ever, just ahead of Luke Shaw
Roscoe Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, cocknose said: Have to get another midfielder , have to Definitely we have great players in there but we need some physicality, some presence, we’re too easily played through at times
Case Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 25 minutes ago, cocknose said: Have to get another midfielder , have to It's not the highest priority, but it is 100% essential.
cocknose Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Yeah, left back, centre back, midfielder and striker are essential, keep most and sell Darwin and I would be confident with that
Frosty Jack Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Keeper, two centre backs, left back, right back, central midfielder, two forwards. That’s the kind of rebuild a snide Manc or Blue tells you the team needs whilst feigning praise.
McBain Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Eiler99 said: Goal and assist for Ekitike today. He's done enough now and he really should stop. We like him but let's not have anyone else interested okay
Gethin Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 hours ago, Cobs said: We lost £57m last season In a period where we were in the Europa League, nuAnny only was partially open and we spent £160m net on players. Things have moved on from there
Big Red Machine Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Cunha defo fails the "don't sign d****eads" test, so can't see us going for him.
Cobs Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Gethin said: In a period where we were in the Europa League, nuAnny only was partially open and we spent £160m net on players. Things have moved on from there They have, CL income being the main one but there’s not money ‘saved’ from that season and that £57mm loss is relevant for PSR
chrisbonnie Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Big Red Machine said: Cunha defo fails the "don't sign d****eads" test, so can't see us going for him. signing a d****ead in Cantona didnt Utd any harm did it. Or us with Suarez
Gethin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Cobs said: They have, CL income being the main one but there’s not money ‘saved’ from that season and that £57mm loss is relevant for PSR It’s only relevant for PSR if we continue to make losses - and there will be a massive amount different in this current financial year and the next one. We should have considerable money to spend even with renewing Mo and Virg’s contracts - and there should be no excuse for the club not to do so.
Cobs Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, chrisbonnie said: signing a d****ead in Cantona didnt Utd any harm did it. Or us with Suarez is he one of them - or a Diouf/Balotelli? Just now, Gethin said: It’s only relevant for PSR if we continue to make losses - and there will be a massive amount different in this current financial year and the next one. We should have considerable money to spend even with renewing Mo and Virg’s contracts - and there should be no excuse for the club not to do so. Oh I think we’ve money - in fact I know we have, the accounts says so but the 3 yr rule is there and so that £57mm loss is relevant
Gethin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Cobs said: so but the 3 yr rule is there and so that £57mm loss is relevant It really isn’t unless the club f*** up massively. That financial year represented a period where we were forced to spend money on a new midfield when a bunch of other sub optimal circumstances were true - and those won’t be this time round
honourablegeorge Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Did we spend enough on stadium stuff that the £57M isn't relevant?
Gethin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, honourablegeorge said: Did we spend enough on stadium stuff that the £57M isn't relevant? That’s actually a fair shout. I reckon a decent chunk of the loss will have been relating to the main company doing nuAnny going bust and the extra expenses incurred in taking a lot of it on house. That stuff doesn’t count for PSR Edited 2 hours ago by Gethin
honourablegeorge Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Yeah, I'd imagine we're close to a clean slate.
Cam Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago 2 hours ago, chrisbonnie said: signing a d****ead in Cantona didnt Utd any harm did it. Or us with Suarez On the pitch? No. Off the pitch though...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now