Transfer Window Speculation

[cocknose]

4 hours ago, YugoB said:

We're clearly looking to sign Huijsen,Kerkez, and are targeting a 9, at bare minimum, that's a decent amount of money we'd be spending, so let's see what happens. We're getting a chunk of money for winning the league, and whatever money we've gotten in the CL. 

I agree.

 

Ornstein again on NBC sports reiterating that we want Huijsen,Kerkez, and a centerforward for sure. 

Have to get another midfielder , have to

[honourablegeorge]

21 minutes ago, WillG said:

Very expensive though

Would be about the ninth most expensive left back ever, just ahead of Luke Shaw

[Roscoe]

2 minutes ago, cocknose said:

Have to get another midfielder , have to

Definitely 

we have great players in there but we need some physicality, some presence, we’re too easily played through at times

[Case]

25 minutes ago, cocknose said:

Have to get another midfielder , have to

It's not the highest priority, but it is 100% essential.

[cocknose]

Yeah, left back, centre back, midfielder and striker are essential, keep most and sell Darwin and I would be confident with that

[Eiler99]

Goal and assist for Ekitike today. 

[Frosty Jack]

Keeper, two centre backs, left back, right back, central midfielder, two forwards.

That’s the kind of rebuild a snide Manc or Blue tells you the team needs whilst feigning praise. 

[McBain]

5 minutes ago, Eiler99 said:

Goal and assist for Ekitike today. 

He's done enough now and he really should stop. We like him but let's not have anyone else interested okay

[Gethin]

7 hours ago, Cobs said:

We lost £57m last season

In a period where we were in the Europa League, nuAnny only was partially open and we spent £160m net on players. Things have moved on from there 

[Big Red Machine]

Cunha defo fails the "don't sign d****eads" test, so can't see us going for him. 

[Cobs]

39 minutes ago, Gethin said:

In a period where we were in the Europa League, nuAnny only was partially open and we spent £160m net on players. Things have moved on from there 

They have, CL income being the main one but there’s not money ‘saved’ from that season and that £57mm loss is relevant for PSR

[chrisbonnie]

16 minutes ago, Big Red Machine said:

Cunha defo fails the "don't sign d****eads" test, so can't see us going for him. 

signing a d****ead in Cantona didnt Utd any harm did it. 

Or us with Suarez

[Gethin]

3 minutes ago, Cobs said:

They have, CL income being the main one but there’s not money ‘saved’ from that season and that £57mm loss is relevant for PSR

It’s only relevant for PSR if we continue to make losses - and there will be a massive amount different in this current financial year and the next one.

We should have considerable money to spend even with renewing Mo and Virg’s contracts - and there should be no excuse for the club not to do so. 

[Cobs]

5 minutes ago, chrisbonnie said:

signing a d****ead in Cantona didnt Utd any harm did it. 

Or us with Suarez

 is he one of them - or a Diouf/Balotelli?

Just now, Gethin said:

It’s only relevant for PSR if we continue to make losses - and there will be a massive amount different in this current financial year and the next one.

We should have considerable money to spend even with renewing Mo and Virg’s contracts - and there should be no excuse for the club not to do so. 

Oh I think we’ve money - in fact I know we have, the accounts says so but the 3 yr rule is there and so that £57mm loss is relevant 

[Gethin]

2 minutes ago, Cobs said:

so but the 3 yr rule is there and so that £57mm loss is relevant 

It really isn’t unless the club f*** up massively.
 

That financial year represented a period where we were forced to spend money on a new midfield when a bunch of other sub optimal circumstances were true - and those won’t be this time round 

 

[honourablegeorge]

Did we spend enough on stadium stuff that the £57M isn't relevant?

[Gethin]

5 minutes ago, honourablegeorge said:

Did we spend enough on stadium stuff that the £57M isn't relevant?

That’s actually a fair shout. I reckon a decent chunk of the loss will have been relating to the main company doing nuAnny going bust and the extra expenses incurred in taking a lot of it on house. That stuff doesn’t count for PSR

Edited 7 minutes ago by Gethin

[honourablegeorge]

Yeah, I'd imagine we're close to a clean slate.