Jump to content
I will no longer be developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, honourablegeorge said:

He's a left footer, isn't he? Virgil being in his spot might count against us, he'd feel he wouldn't play.

Good with both feet apparently 

Posted
4 hours ago, Hassony said:

Oh, when i saw your post, I was a Baleba....

I've been feeling quite happy about getting some recent accolades for my jokes but seeing this unoriginal clone of a joke get two laughs totally cheapens it all. 

Hope you're happy Hass. Hope you're really f***ing happy. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Tbf I would have him playing instead of Dom

He’d have been playing on his own without Macca or Grav though

Posted
26 minutes ago, Swipe said:

He’d have been playing on his own without Macca or Grav though

If we could've got him for £115m he could be playing with MacAllister. 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, PaulMcC186 said:

If we could've got him for £115m he could be playing with MacAllister. 

We got those three lads for a bit more than Bellingham would have cost. I think getting those three instead was a wise decision. Fair play if others would still have preferred Bellingham. 

Edited by Swipe
Posted
2 minutes ago, Swipe said:

We got those three lads for a bit more than Bellingham would have cost. I think getting those three instead was a wise decision. Fair play if others would still have preferred Bellingham. 

We offered £115m for Caicedo. That's why I was saying if we could get Bellingham for £115m.

I think I'd rather MacAllister and Bellingham than the 3 we have. Not 100%, though.

Posted
Just now, PaulMcC186 said:

We offered £115m for Caicedo. That's why I was saying if we could get Bellingham for £115m.

I think I'd rather MacAllister and Bellingham than the 3 we have. Not 100%, though.

We’d have been in trouble with just those two. Bellingham has been invisible almost every time I’ve seen him this season. 

Posted
1 minute ago, PaulMcC186 said:

think I'd rather MacAllister and Bellingham than the 3 we have. Not 100%, though.

We won the league with our lot 

So f*** Bellingham 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, Swipe said:

We’d have been in trouble with just those two. Bellingham has been invisible almost every time I’ve seen him this season. 

Gravenberch and Szoboslai have been invisible plenty too.

MacAlister is fine as a holding player. He does loads of work defensively anyway.

I haven't watched loads of Madrid but he's 11 goals and 10 assists this season.

2 minutes ago, Hassony said:

We won the league with our lot 

So f*** Bellingham 

By that logic we shouldn't sign anyone. 

Posted
Just now, Swipe said:

You’d have preferred Bellingham. I’m fine with how it worked out. It’s cool. 

Bellingham with MacAllister. Not instead of the three. I'm fine how it worked out too. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Swipe said:

You’d have preferred Bellingham. I’m fine with how it worked out. It’s cool. 

I'm also happy with how it worked out. As long as we could have also had Mac and Grav I would have taken Bellingham over Dom for the greater output. Would have lost some of the energy though, so balance might not be as good

Posted
7 minutes ago, PaulMcC186 said:

 

By that logic we shouldn't sign anyone. 

No really

We might have not won anything with Bellingham,  and he would have been already flirting with Madrid...who knows what would have happened 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hassony said:

No really

We might have not won anything with Bellingham,  and he would have been already flirting with Madrid...who knows what would have happened 

 

And if we signed Kvara instead of Chiesa we might not have won anything but chances are we would.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...