S*n Jurnos banned from Anfield

[Jonesy]

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/liverpool-ban-the-sun-hillsborough-disaster-reporters-attending-matches-anfield-a7573621.html

[Cobs]

Good

 

Why has this taken 27 years?

[Sir Tokyo Sexwale]

was going to say as much

[RBM]

About time

[Earl Hafler]

That says because of Hillsborough but didn't Klopp imply there was also another reason ?

[stonty]

Proper order

[Jonesy]

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/everton-fan-group-urge-blues-12588099

 

Go'ed The Ev

[muleskinner]

That says because of Hillsborough but didn't Klopp imply there was also another reason ?

Alleged sextape sting involving Nathaniel Clyne

[Earl Hafler]

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/everton-fan-group-urge-blues-12588099

 

Go'ed The Ev

 

The Echo website is a bit like the Ev

[kop205]

Not sure the alleged other reason bears repeating really. f*** them and their s***ty f***ing stories

 

Inaccuracy in that Independent report as wel - Tony Bland died in March 1993 as a result of artificial feeding being withdrawn, I believe.

 

I wish they'd get stuff like this right.

Edited February 10, 2017 by kop205

[Molby]

Suspicious timing again

[Tosh]

About time but if it's good enough for the White House

[Drexl]

Suspicious timing again

What?

[psl]

Suspicious timing again

You're suggesting some dark arts there.

[Molby]

You're suggesting some dark arts there.

they do it all the time

 

let's be clear: the club banned the Sun right?

that's what happened

 

27 years after the event but only a day after their popularity has once again plummeted in social media

[mally]

To be honest i'm a bit baffled by this but only because I thought they were already banned. There's definitely more to this, has to be.

 

Have they been allowed in that whole time? If so, why? It just throws up the whole question of why now?

[Cobs]

There's been much lower moments over the past quarter century than this to ban The Sun and temporarily distract our stupid fanbase, if that's what you're about

[Molby]

There's been much lower moments over the past quarter century than this to ban The Sun and temporarily distract our stupid fanbase, if that's what you're about

 

 

yes but that was before we had these f***ers in charge, with their PR machine and their utter contempt for us

[muleskinner]

It goes back to the inquest verdicts doesn't it, and discussion with HFSG? And also kelvin mckenzies continuing presence in the rag.

[Molby]

It goes back to the inquest verdicts doesn't it, and discussion with HFSG? And also kelvin mckenzies continuing presence in the rag.

how do you mean?

 

it's 27 years after that story appeared 

[muleskinner]

how do you mean?

 

it's 27 years after that story appeared

That the decision thats been made has happened since the inquest verdicts and the rags reaction to it and importantly the families wishes as to what to do.

I was a bit baffled by the news today I'll admit and have always wondered why they were allowed access. But I don't think it's a pr stunt by fsg.

[mally]

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/sn-liverpool-took-28-years-12587844

[Cam]

I'm a little confused. We've been told for 28 years that although no direct links (interviews, adverts etc) will be allowed some limited access (press conferences, covering games etc) is good for the club. And finally I accepted that so now it seems 'wrong' just because we've been told for so long it was right.

 

I'm hoping it's just because Klopp is amazingly principled. But then we've had principled men in situ since 1989, not least Kenny, and this isn't happened.

 

If this is linked to something else, like the suggested sting or the other private matter of a player raised last year, then whilst that is pretty darned sh*tty of the paper I'm hoping it's not about pandering to a spoilt player... just because it should be about so much more than that.

 

Obviously it should have occurred 28 years ago but banning the rag from the canteen at Melwood is only relatively recent. Maybe we're going to war against them, which will be rocky but a fight worth fighting, but where does this leave the "it's okay not to boycott The Times and Sky"? They'll be gunning for the club now.

 

If this is for Hillsborough then I'm a little baffled & want a little more info but ultimately my opinion means nothing - I'm behind the families. If it's Klopp making a stand for values then I'm 100% behind it. I can't really see it being PR-driven because a continuation of the uneasy alliance would be the easy decision for PR.

 

Anyway, f*** them.

[muleskinner]

Why cheapen your point by calling the player spoilt? Nobody deserves the s*** they dish out.

[Cam]

Fair point.

 

They don't deserve it, clearly. It's just scummy 'journalism'. I'm just saying I'm hoping it's more than that. But yeah, your point is 100% correct.

Edited February 10, 2017 by Cam