Jump to content
I will no longer be developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

Posted

With all this Suarez press and in general any press associated with Liverpool, it always seems the negative gets more 'hits' than the positive, as in more airtime, press coverage written and online. As with everything in the entertainment world, the more publicity you get the better, bad or good. Your brand is getting plastered all over the place.

 

So it begs the question does all of the negative press liverpool get actually maintain our profile, results on the pitch-wise we should be nowhere near where we are in this respect. The general reaction by everyone associated with Liverpool club probably fuels the circus too so keep it up lads...

Posted

As with everything in the entertainment world, the more publicity you get the better, bad or good. Your brand is getting plastered all over the place.

 

Your brand getting plastered all over the place, in a negative sense, is not good.

Do you imagine the BBC is enjoying the Jimmy Savile stuff?

Posted

Your brand getting plastered all over the place, in a negative sense, is not good.

Do you imagine the BBC is enjoying the Jimmy Savile stuff?

Haha! The Director General is currently sitting there saying to his staff "the only thing worse than being talked about, is not being talked about."

Posted

as far as I can see, almost every time we get negative press it isn't our fault

 

so what we need, at the risk of repeating myself, is to deal with it. We hired a PR bod didn't we? what the f*** for, is what i want to know

 

can't someone tweet him and ask? you lot are all on twitter and you can't tweet Chang? talk about preferring problems to solutions

 

get on your f***ing bikes, like Norman Tebbit and do something or I may flounce

Posted

as far as I can see, almost every time we get negative press it isn't our fault

 

so what we need, at the risk of repeating myself, is to deal with it. We hired a PR bod didn't we? what the f*** for, is what i want to know

 

can't someone tweet him and ask? you lot are all on twitter and you can't tweet Chang? talk about preferring problems to solutions

 

get on your f***ing bikes, like Norman Tebbit and do something or I may flounce

 

 

time it took you to type that you could have signed up to twitter and done it yourself !

Posted

time it took you to type that you could have signed up to twitter and done it yourself !

I agree

 

but I'm swerving twitter....too busy and need to replace faceless communication with country walks wherever possible - you know how it is

 

thought someone else might fancy doing something useful and necessary, after all we all support Liverpool don't we?

 

 

Posted

We are so slow out of the blocks when it comes to all this negativity aimed at our players etc.

We should have released that statement from Brendan and co, asap, the timing what with the all new shiny football empire at St Georges Park, could have been better,

weve basically let Pulis call the shots here and thats something to think about.

He knew what he was doing, and we just faff about running round like headless chickens trying to muster up some sort of response.

I agreed with every part of the clubs statement, but it was all a bit, well, slow and too late.

 

Pr Cheng and co need to do their jobs better. And im still reeling at the lack of appeal for Jonjo's red card. Pathetic football club.

Like a wet fanny being poked by a really floppy penis. No penetration, no satisfaction and no end product.

Posted

I agree

 

but I'm swerving twitter....too busy and need to replace faceless communication with country walks wherever possible - you know how it is

 

thought someone else might fancy doing something useful and necessary, after all we all support Liverpool don't we?

 

Have you been this house in Crosby yet

Posted

Have you been this house in Crosby yet

 

I called them to make an appointment and they are still waiting to get hold of the owners

 

 

so the plot thickens.....

Posted

Your brand getting plastered all over the place, in a negative sense, is not good.

Do you imagine the BBC is enjoying the Jimmy Savile stuff?

 

My missus said the revelations about Jimmy Saville actually only made him go up in her estimation. After the Louis Theroux thing, a few years back, most people had him down as all but a closet Fred West. These latest stories elevate him to the (relatively) less sordid status of the likes of Bill Wyman, Elvis Presley and the French.

Posted

My missus said the revelations about Jimmy Saville actually only made him go up in her estimation. After the Louis Theroux thing, a few years back, most people had him down as all but a closet Fred West. These latest stories elevate him to the (relatively) less sordid status of the likes of Bill Wyman, Elvis Presley and the French.

exactly. accusations of child molestation are nothing compared to f*cking your dead mother's corpse for four days.

Posted

My missus said the revelations about Jimmy Saville actually only made him go up in her estimation. After the Louis Theroux thing, a few years back, most people had him down as all but a closet Fred West. These latest stories elevate him to the (relatively) less sordid status of the likes of Bill Wyman, Elvis Presley and the French.

 

There were always two rumours about Savile: that he was a child molestor, and that he shagged the corpses at Stoke Mandeville hospital.

Now that one of them's turned out to be true...

Posted

There were always two rumours about Savile: that he was a child molestor, and that he shagged the corpses at Stoke Mandeville hospital.

Now that one of them's turned out to be true...

 

Wow. That's properly hyperbolic depravity.

 

He's a good 3-5 standard deviations from the mean of that normal distribution at both ends.

Posted

There were always two rumours about Savile: that he was a child molestor, and that he shagged the corpses at Stoke Mandeville hospital.

Now that one of them's turned out to be true...

he always raised a lot of charity money for stoke mandeville as well didn't he. basically funding his own morbid brothel.

Posted

There were always two rumours about Savile: that he was a child molestor, and that he shagged the corpses at Stoke Mandeville hospital.

Now that one of them's turned out to be true...

 

Well exactly. Not mutually exclusive, are they?

Posted

he always raised a lot of charity money for stoke mandeville as well didn't he. basically funding his own morbid brothel.

 

 

victimless crime

Posted

victimless crime

he seemed to like having sex with decomposing corpses and live twelve year olds. opposite ends of the spectrum there. wonder if he ever actually tried it with a living, breathing, adult woman? perhaps he did and that was only the start of it. . .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...