Jump to content
I will no longer be developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Spirit Of Shankly: LFC, BarCap and Re-Financing

Spirit Of Shankly

By Spirit Of Shankly
in Liverpool FC

 Share

Recommended Posts

Falconhoof

Falconhoof

Posted
Posted

link here

 

LFC, BarCap and Re-Financing

Friday 17th September 2010

 

 

The Spirit of Shankly Supporters' Union have had sight of an internal Barclays Capital document that supplies information about the state of Liverpool Football Club's finances over the Summer of 2010. While the original copy document is not in the Union's possession, a full and accurate copy of it has been made and is attached here.

 

The document throws up many questions about the public messages coming from Martin Broughton, the Club and Barclays Capital underlining again that Liverpool Football Club teeters on the edge of a financial abyss.

 

From the documents the Spirit of Shankly have gleaned the following main points:

 

 

Up until at least the beginning of August, if Barcap were indeed serious about seeking a buyer they had also been seeking to re-finance the debt. So much so that they refer to approaching around 25 potential investors.

 

The Executive Directors (Broughton, Purslow and Ayre) sought advice from Slaughter and May (a large international legal practice) concerning whether re-financing by RBS should be approved in light of their fiduciary responsibilities. Their duties as Directors are to act in the interests of the club. The club in this instance is Hicks and Gillett. Their appears to be legal argument about how they can act in the best interests of the club and therefore the shareholders, considering the circumstances.

 

 

On the basis of Slaughter and May's advice, BarCap subsequently made an amended re-financing proposal. It is not clear from this document whether that amendment was sufficient for Slaughter and May to have since indicated that the changes were sufficient to allay the Executive Directors' reservations.

 

The firms identified as being willing to be involved in re-financing the Club’s debt are identified as FBR, Beach Point, Halcyon, Blackrock, DK Partners, Stonetower, Trimaran, DE Shaw, Avenue, Centrebridge and GSO.

 

In the period July to August the Club’s debt was increased in the following sums:

15/07/2010 Ticking Fee: £5.0m

 

15/08/2010 Ticking Fee: £7.5m

 

31/08/2010 Ticking Fee: £7.5m

 

PIK Increase (Aug): £0.8m

 

 

 

Total: £20.8m

 

 

 

 

The sum currently required to re-finance the Club is £300m. However, this can be reduced to £187.5m through using the proceeds of a £75m loan to the holding company in Delaware and by rolling £37.5m into the proposed loan for the new stadium. This plan for securing debt against the as yet unbuilt stadium, means should the stadium finally come to fruition, revenue it generates would contribute towards the ownership debt as opposed to its construction.

 

 

FBR propose to lend £75m to Kop Delaware. Delaware is a "deregulated" haven in the USA, along the same lines as Cayman. As such, it would not be unreasonable to think that a similar mechanism to the Kop Cayman loan could take place in due course, i.e. Kop Delaware could "lend" this money to LFC. (FBR is a top ten rated US investment bank)

The questions that this document raises, among others, are:

 

Why did Martin Broughton say the club would be sold "before the end of the transfer season" when BarCap were proposing re-financing "solutions" until at least the end of July?

 

Did the changes proposed by BarCap , in line with Slaughter & May's advice, sufficiently address the Executive Directors' questions regarding their fiduciary responsibilities, and as a result prevent them from using this argument to continue to stop re-financing?

 

In light of the apparent position that the Executive Directors appear to have powers vested in them by means of conditions attached to the RBS debt, what would the position of the Executive Directors be if either or both of the owners could raise sufficient to debt to repay RBS?

 

Could they refuse to allow RBS to be repaid? Would RBS accept payment with the result of removing the current powers apparently held by the Executive Directors?

 

So, the major question to be answered is are Barcap currently engaged with any prospective buyers or is it pursuing a re-financing or both?

The document is clearly very technical and for Spirit of Shankly members and supporters it is another in a long line of pieces of information that make little sense to the average supporter. We feel it is in supporters' best interests to be aware of this information, and we will endeavour to keep you fully updated of any further developments, along with our plans for action to follow on from recent developments.

 

 

The Spirit of Shankly are urging the senior management of LFC to engage with the supporters in using the supporters who are the only solution to this problem. We will be ensuring that those at LFC are fully aware of our views and we will be planning for all potential outcomes.

 

 

RBS need to bring this issue to a close as far as they can, without leaving a vacuum behind. They will not be forgiven, after bleeding the Club for two years or more, if they do not also take steps to secure Liverpool Football Club’s long term future.

 

The Spirit of Shankly has proposed action by supporters following its EGM on the 25th September 2010 .

 

In addition Spirit of Shankly-Share LiverpoolFC are seeking to engage in the sale process and this information merely underlines again that it is the supporters and only the supporters who can solve this problem.

 

We urge the Club, RBS and Barclays Capital to recognise our solution and work together to save our Club.

 

 

 

 

> Back to the main Union news page

 

 

4

Share

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

News

News Home

 

In the press

 

 

 

 

Latest News & Updates

LFC, BarCap and Re-Financing

The Spirit of Shankly Supporters' Union have had sight of an internal Barclays Capital document that supplies information about the state of Liver...More

Tom Hicks and George Gillett - Tonight's Game

Following reports regarding Hicks and Gillett's possible attendance at tonight's match against Steaua Bucharest, Spirit Of Shankly has enquired with...More

Spirit Of Shankly - EGM Agenda 25th September 2010

The Spirit of Shankly Management Committee recognise the extreme concern of members and supporters and the current apparent lack of progress over the ...More

 

 

>All news...

 

 

 

Upcoming events

 

 

Manchester United Away Coach - SOLD OUT Sunday 19th September 2010

Utrecht Away Travel Thursday 30th September 2010

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Zoob

Zoob

Posted
Posted

Oh good. So the investment bank brought in to sell us, is actually trying to refinance us, since they'll make more money this way.

 

SoS should send that copy of the document to the national press, although I'm sure this will be picked up by some anyway...good work getting hold of that document anyway...

 

Couple of minor points about their release: Broughton never said the club would be sold by the end of the transfer window - he said this was his aim. Don''t think it helps matters to mis-represent what he said...

 

And "In light of the apparent position that the Executive Directors appear to have powers vested in them by means of conditions attached to the RBS debt, what would the position of the Executive Directors be if either or both of the owners could raise sufficient to debt to repay RBS?" reads somewhat like gibberish

 

SoS say they don't understand what it all means - maybe they should have reached out to some of the financial bods who post on forums to get their read / interpretation..

owenthomas

owenthomas

Posted
Posted

Do something or do nothing.

i've made time to get on my laptop tonight.. thought i'd have a little check here first.. going offline in a sec to Do Something.. it starts here..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Home

Notifications

PMs
×
×
  • Create New...