jimmylibel Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Just looking at the tanget the Jovanovic thread has gotten into about the worst player to ever play for LFC, I was wondering who everyone thought was our worst ever signing? I'm not just talking about the headline figure but also the context of the time, the contribution made, how hard they were to shift etc. Personally I think it's got to be Julian Dicks. We got rid of Mike Marsh and David Burrows (decent enough players at the time) and it was the British transfer record for a defender at the time (something like £2.3 million I think). He was always injured, didn't play that well and I think he only featured in something like 24 games before we sold him back to West Ham a year or so later.
Sion Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Diouf or Diao have got to be up there. Aquilani is in danger of joining the club.
Epic Swindle Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 In recent times it's Dossena for me. It's still a puzzler that one.
Raj Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Paul Stewart. Why?He wasn't even very good for Man City
Gunga Din Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Paul Stewart. he was absolute s****. Diouf isnt a bad player. he's a t***, but not a bad footballer. Stewart was just s****.and we paid over £2mil for him, when 2mil was a lot of money Aquilani is staking a claim at the minute too, if we are talking pound for pound. as would robbie keane
Bailo Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 On a pure cost/impact assessment, Aquilani. If you don't consider players still here, one of Diao, Ferri, Diomede, Carter, Speedie, Kvarme or Josemi.
Cobs Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Dicks was £1.5m i think Jimmy Carter bought for just under a million shifted on after a handful of games was of the same ilk - how we got money for him i'll never know - was he one of George Graham's bungs? in terms of money spent for what we got back Cisse & Keane have to be up there and Babb was a record signing but Diao remains my No.1
Raj Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Aquilani is staking a claim at the minute too, if we are talking pound for pound. as would robbie keane I can see that two above have ability though, but sometimes players just dont fit into a club's system.Stewart was just utter gash
Maldini Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Robbie Keane, I still think it cost us the league.
Bailo Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Pound for wasted pound i think its DioufProblem with Diouf was that that summer we needed those signings to work, so it makes his transfer look worse than it really was. Same with Keane and Aquilani.
Cobs Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Paul Stewart. Why?He wasn't even very good for Man City 26 goals in 51 games for City but he was dogschit for us
Raj Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 26 goals in 51 games for City but he was dogschit for us Weren't a lot of them in the Second Division?
Gunga Din Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 On a pure cost/impact assessment, Aquilani. If you don't consider players still here, one of Diao, Ferri, Diomede, Carter, Speedie, Kvarme or Josemi. speedie played 12 games. he scored 6 times. he scored against the mancs and the bitters in the same week. doesnt deserve to be in this thread
Flight Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Dicks was £1.5m i think Dicks was one of the 'it never happens' player trades wasn't he ? Was still very bad business, though, I agree. Paul Stewart. he was absolute s****. Diouf isnt a bad player. he's a t***, but not a bad footballer. Stewart was just s****.and we paid over £2mil for him, when 2mil was a lot of money Good shout. And then £2.5mill for Ruddock the following summer, back when that was a lot. A dark period.
Cobs Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Weren't a lot of them in the Second Division? nope
Hassony Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Problem with Diouf was that that summer we needed those signings to work, so it makes his transfer look worse than it really was. Same with Keane and Aquilani. the diouf signing was awful, whichever way you look at it, we probably paid three times more than he was worth
Gunga Din Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 the diouf signing was awful, whichever way you look at it, we probably paid three times more than he was worth we paid 2.3 million times what Stewart was worth
dorgie Posted August 18, 2010 Posted August 18, 2010 Dean Saunders is another contender in my opinion.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now