Jump to content
I will no longer be developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.sportspromedia.com/deals/_a/liv...cation_websites

 

Liverpool, the English soccer club which signed a record shirt sponsorship deal with Standard Chartered earlier this year, has agreed another lucrative partnership.

 

The club will be backed by 188Bet, the online betting company which already has partnerships in place with Aston Villa, Chelsea, Bolton and Wigan. The partnership will last for three years, and is expected to earn the club as much as US$7.5 million.

 

"We are delighted to welcome 188Bet to our family of partners. Their innovative approach to betting will enhance the fan experience, in addition to benefiting good causes through the 188 Foundation," said Ian Ayre, commercial director of Liverpool Football Club.

 

"Given 188Bet's presence in Asia, we will develop a number of initiatives that will mutually benefit our respective organisations. 188Bet has made a clear commitment to marketing their brand through football, and we are looking forward to developing a successful partnership," he added.

 

 

Good to see we're finally exploring all possible opportunities to make some cash.

Posted (edited)
Good to see we're finally exploring all possible opportunities to make some cash pay off the debts of Hicks and Gillet.
Edited by Ernest Blenkinsop
Posted

From the Kraft link in the first post:

 

However, it is the large section of Liverpool's fans currently dissatisfied with the club's owner, George Gillett and Tom Hicks, who have perhaps the most reason to welcome Platini's reforms. Robert Kraft, one of US sport's most respected team owners, has long expressed an interest in taking control of Liverpool, but has said he will not do so while the financial situation in English soccer remains out of control.

 

"We don't want to be a business where the wallet determines what kind of player you have," he told the British press in October, before adding to the New York Times: "At some point in the future there's a good possibility we could be involved.

 

In June, he revealed: "I met with David Moores, who is a fine gentleman , and we came very close to buying it, very close. I wanted to take over Liverpool. If the salary cap was there, we would have done it."

 

Is this American for mug or complete tw at?

Posted

His quote makes no sense.

 

The 2 positions of;

 

1) we are really close to buying the club, really close, so close I can smell the scouse pies

2) there's no wage cap so we aren't buying the club

 

don't stack up.

Posted
His quote makes no sense.

 

The 2 positions of;

 

1) we are really close to buying the club, really close, so close I can smell the scouse pies

2) there's no wage cap so we aren't buying the club

 

don't stack up.

 

therr wont ever be a wage cap, so i wouldnt be holding my breath for Kraft

Posted
From the Kraft link in the first post:

 

However, it is the large section of Liverpool's fans currently dissatisfied with the club's owner, George Gillett and Tom Hicks, who have perhaps the most reason to welcome Platini's reforms. Robert Kraft, one of US sport's most respected team owners, has long expressed an interest in taking control of Liverpool, but has said he will not do so while the financial situation in English soccer remains out of control.

 

"We don't want to be a business where the wallet determines what kind of player you have," he told the British press in October, before adding to the New York Times: "At some point in the future there's a good possibility we could be involved.

 

In June, he revealed: "I met with David Moores, who is a fine gentleman , and we came very close to buying it, very close. I wanted to take over Liverpool. If the salary cap was there, we would have done it."

 

Is this American for mug or complete tw at?

we would be lucky if he took over,but we aren't lucky.

Posted
$7.5million over 3 years is not much to get excited about in the grand scheme of things is it?

 

Nah, but we've signed a couple of other deals for simila amounts over the last year or two. 5 or 6 of these "partnerships" could be about as much as the massive main sponsorship deal.

 

Glad to see we ditched Paddy Power too after they paid out on United for the league as a stunt last year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...