Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 (edited) Voronin - why play him ?Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'?Why take off the better forward off *Ngog* ?Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ?Why play Babel on the left ? You all hate Emile, but f*** you, Hess is ten times the player than that c*** in our No.10. Edited October 28, 2009 by Kev
CarraLegend Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Voronin - why play him ?Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'?Why take off the better forward *Ngog* ?Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ?Why play Babel on the left ? You all hate Emile, but f*** you, Hess is ten times the player than that c*** in our No.10. f*** off you annoying prick.
Nebraska Red Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Voronin - why play him ? no other options Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'? you got me there. Why take off the better forward *Ngog* ? cause he'll be needed at the weekend Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ? cause he'll be needed at the weekend Why play Babel on the left ? why play Babel at all? sometimes 10 men might be better than 11 including Babel.
Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Author Posted October 28, 2009 f*** off you annoying prick. ooooooo......scared.....................................................
Sion Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 (edited) Voronin - why play him ?Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'?Why take off the better forward off *Ngog* ?Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ?Why play Babel on the left ? are you for real? does this really warrant it's own thread?FWIW 1) because whether you like it or not he's a part of the squad and needs match practice2) what's that even mean? would you want us to go all out attack after 60 minutes?3) maybe he was tired?/saved for Fulham4) because there was a big chance it would go to extra time5) because he wanted to Edited October 28, 2009 by Sion
Benzo-13 Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Voronin - why play him ?Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'?Why take off the better forward off *Ngog* ?Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ?Why play Babel on the left ? You all hate Emile, but f*** you, Hess is ten times the player than that c*** in our No.10.
CarraLegend Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 ooooooo......scared..................................................... Its not a threat you whopper, you're just embarassing yourself again.
tomasjj Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Voronin looked better than Kuyt out there today.created a few chances and did well in periods, was invisible in others though.
San Diego Red Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 ooooooo......scared.....................................................jesus.
Knox_Harrington Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Voronin - why play him ?Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'?Why take off the better forward off *Ngog* ?Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ?Why play Babel on the left ?Why do you think he played Voronin?Why do you think he waited until there was ten to go before "going for it"?Why do you think he took off N'Gog?Why do you think he gave Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week?Why do you think he played Babel on the left?Why don't you ask yourself the questions, have a think about it, especially overnight and then come on and get involved in a decent conversation about football rather than us having to go through this maelstrom of nonsense after virtually every game that perpetuates itself for two days?
Hightown Phil Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 If we'd have scored Aquilani would have ended up playing 45 minutes. So, that's probably why.
Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Author Posted October 28, 2009 are you for real? does this really warrant it's own thread?FWIW 1) because whether you like it or not he's a part of the squad and needs match practiceNo, he is robbing the club as much as G&H2) what's that even mean? would you want us to go all out attack after 60 minutes?Well yes, gives us more time to score, we looked really dangerous in the last 10, maybe in more time we might of scored.3) maybe he was tired?/saved for Fulham. He'll be on the bench again. So how much rest does he really need ?4) because there was a big chance it would go to extra timeNot with a forward line that got beat by a rice pudding.5) because he wanted toHe is useless on the left, we all know that.
johngibo YPC Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 What the f*** has Emile Heskey got to do with anything?
Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Author Posted October 28, 2009 Its not a threat you whopper, you're just embarassing yourself again. f*** off
stressederic Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Voronin - why play him ?Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'?Why take off the better forward off *Ngog* ?Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ?Why play Babel on the left ? You all hate Emile, but f*** you, Hess is ten times the player than that c*** in our No.10. 1) He's in the squad, we may need to make use of him. Also if he's playing tonight it means the likes of Torres don't have to. 2) Because he didn't want us to go gung hom all game and maybe get passed to death? 3) He's going to get more minutes in the first team than Voronin will, so probably needs to be looked after more. 4) Because there's a difference between some dead rubber reserves game and a proper competitive match that might still go to extra time. 5) Because Kuyt is on the right, Babel isn't smart enough to go upfront and perhaps Rafa thought he might have some luck against their right back. Now wind your neck in.
Tones Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 To be fair Voronin looked better in the latter part of the game, so maybe a good idea to keep him on. Emile is a donkey.
Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Author Posted October 28, 2009 Why do you think he played Voronin?Haven't a clueWhy do you think he waited until there was ten to go before "going for it"?Because he always does wait until its to lateWhy do you think he took off N'Gog?Haven't a clueWhy do you think he gave Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week?haven't a clueWhy do you think he played Babel on the left?haven't a clueWhy don't you ask yourself the questions, have a think about it, especially overnight and then come on and get involved in a decent conversation about football rather than us having to go through this maelstrom of nonsense after virtually every game that perpetuates itself for two days?haven't a clue
Gomez Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Voronin - why play him ?Because we have literally, no one else. Why wait till 10 minutes to go before ' going for it'?Erm, you what? Why take off the better forward off *Ngog* ?Does it matter? Neither looked like scoring? Why give Aquilani less time than he had in the reserves last week ?Because was basically a friendly, and this was a competitive match and thus tougher, and it was what? 2 minutes less? Seriously one of the lamest criticisms of Rafa ever. Why play Babel on the left ?Because we have literally, no one else. You all hate Emile, but f*** you, Hess is ten times the player than that c*** in our No.10.Heskey would be better than Voronin, I admit, but if Heskey wanted to come back here, he would have waited six months and not signed for Villa. Personally, I don't think Rafa should go back in for him, he's had his chance, and he'd get less games here than at Villa anyway.
FC Showster Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 So to summarize Kev, is it fair to say you haven't a clue?
Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Author Posted October 28, 2009 Then have a think. haven't a clue I actually enjoyed the game tonight, I was made up for Insua, it was nice to see Eccleston and Aquilani (if only brief). but Arsenal were there for the taking with a bit more adventure than the final 10 minutes.
Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Author Posted October 28, 2009 So to summarize Kev, is it fair to say you haven't a clue? I'll keep feeding you
stressederic Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Why do you think he waited until there was ten to go before "going for it"?Because he always does wait until its to late That's b******s. We were dead stand-offish and defensive against United at the weekend.
Red Kent Posted October 28, 2009 Author Posted October 28, 2009 That's b******s. We were dead stand-offish and defensive against United at the weekend. We were winning going into the last ten minutes
Recommended Posts