anny road Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 you know what, i would take him as back up
anny road Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Chili Palmer said: nah, not for me. never go back. cliche city Ian Rush? and before anyone says i am comparing Rush to Heskey, f*** off...
Florist Cinema Pond Goal Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 On one hand having an effective target man in the squad would be a good thing, on the other if we were ever to play Kuyt and Heskey up front who the f*** would score the goals?
psl Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 That comment after the story about adding a welcome option for RB. Do you think he means Rafa Benitez or right back?
Jimi Rojo Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 He'd be a great option to have now Crouch has gone. Fine by me.
anny road Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 i think Torres would do well with Heskey in certain games...wether you like it or not, he causes defences problems due to his strength and size and takes defenders out, that would mean space for the likes of Torres and Keane not in every game, but he would do a job i dont think it would happen tho
Chili Palmer Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 anny road said: cliche city Ian Rush? and before anyone says i am comparing Rush to Heskey, f*** off... game of opinions Dave. There are no easy games in the premiership for big Emile to play in, Kev may be over the moon with the signing but I would be as sick as a parrot, would it make us stronger on paper, maybe. and with 7 subs there will be alot of games that turn out to be a game of 2 halves so he might be useful to have on the bench. too many options might leave our forward lin at sixes and sevens. I doubt he will come back but footballs a funny old game.
McBain Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Kuyt proved beyond all measure of doubt yesterday that if he has a future here it should be upfront. So with Torres, Keane and Kuyt we would have more than enough there And i still wake up screaming in terror when thinking about Emile's last 2 years at the club
Stevie H Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 could and should have been world class, heskey. wouldn't want him back now though.
Earl Hafler Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Chili Palmer said: nah, not for me. never go back. At his best he's better than Crouch, Kuyt...Diouf. But we have good young prospects and buying Heskey back would only confuse matters.
McBain Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Rafa brought back Fowler and tried to bring back Owen. If he signed Emile then Stan Collymore should seriously think about getting back to the gym just in case
David Hodgson Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 If he was genuinely cheap, £3m or under, then he'd be a great buy. There's no doubt that without Crouch we lack a certain kind of option.
Rimbeux Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Not for me. Not a good move for either. He should be looking at playing every week and taking his second chance at international football. We should be looking to bring on our young generation of forwards as back up to the senior players, of which we have plenty, not bringing another in who'll maybe start one game in five, scoring at the same rate.
Snookie Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Heskey is one of those "could have, should have but never were" players that crop up every now and then. He's got the talent but never had the belief. Maybe that's starting to grow but I'd prefer to see the younger players being brought through.
Earl Hafler Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Snookie said: Heskey is one of those "could have, should have but never were" players that crop up every now and then. He's got the talent but never had the belief. Maybe that's starting to grow but I'd prefer to see the younger players being brought through. True. For every disk-spinning goal there was a biting-a-wasp-off-a-piss-stained-nettle performance
Raj Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 Heskey was never a bad player. He has fantastic attributes, but unfortunately he doesn't have the belief or heart, to perform consistently enough.
meepins Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 David Hodgson said: If he was genuinely cheap, £3m or under, then he'd be a great buy. There's no doubt that without Crouch we lack a certain kind of option.Yep we definitely have a hole in the current squad. We need players who fall down a lot more.
anny road Posted September 14, 2008 Posted September 14, 2008 the myth surrounding Emile at our place is staggering, he wasnt anywhere as bad as some like to make out in fact in the treble winning season his name was sung so much it was bordering in boring i remember at the Porto game at Anfield counting it in the second half and gave up at about 14!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now