Jump to content
I will no longer be developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

Guest Prongsy
Posted
Irrelevant if he was offside, which he was.

 

But if he just stood still the goal would have stood. It's through his own selfishness in trying to poke it home that he became active and touched the ball, thus stopping it going over.

 

So it's not that irrelevant.

Posted
If Carras hand touches the line here Bendtner is NOT offside...

 

20080403-n38f43kg76uu47bypigd18qses.jpg

 

 

 

LOL LOL, you think a linesman [who I believe flagged] can spot fingers?? Sami may be there, but Pepe isn't. And if he hadn't touched it and it had counted, it's just further proof that the not interfering with play rule is dumb....which it is regardless.

Posted
it's just further proof that the not interfering with play rule is dumb....which it is regardless.

 

I agree, the rule is dumb.

How come defenders are not ruled in the same way as strikers? I mean, a defender can be 40 yards away tieing his shoelaces and he's still 'active'. Isn't he? :unsure:

Posted
Makes no difference.

 

Of course it does.

 

If he's off the field of play for whatever reason he's not counted. Otherwise players being treated for injuries on the sideline could mark someone onside, which would be completely ridiculous.

Posted
Of course it does.

 

If he's off the field of play for whatever reason he's not counted. Otherwise players being treated for injuries on the sideline could mark someone onside, which would be completely ridiculous.

 

He is still active

Posted

Never looked into the rule but my uncle always says players are not allowed leave the field of play unless permitted by the ref and therefore its against the rules to step off the field of play to maximise the offside rule - any statto heads here that can advise on that point ?

Posted

If he had left the field of play with the referee's permission (e.g. to be treated for an injury) then of course he would not be active. But if stepping over the goal-line was a legit way of playing someone offside, do you not think players would use it as a regular tactic??

 

Anyway, Sami and Carra were definitely playing Bendner onside - no question about it.

Posted
He was offside, but if he'd got out of the way then I believe the goal would have stood.

 

He wasn't offside.

Posted
Of course it does.

 

If he's off the field of play for whatever reason he's not counted. Otherwise players being treated for injuries on the sideline could mark someone onside, which would be completely ridiculous.

 

 

You tell us you've played at a decent level, but you don't appear to know the laws of the game. :D

Posted
Of course it does.

 

If he's off the field of play for whatever reason he's not counted. Otherwise players being treated for injuries on the sideline could mark someone onside, which would be completely ridiculous.

 

he was still active, an injured player is a different matter because he would need the ref to allow him back on the playing field

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...