mathewbet1 Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 We need a 'Quasemra' or 'Mancini' 'type player' in January to have any chance of winning the PL - FACT, (oh yeah plus a quality young centre back). 20 mil please thank you.
dorgie Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 We need a 'Quasemra' or 'Mancini' 'type player' in January to have any chance of winning the PL - FACT, (oh yeah plus a quality young centre back). 20 mil please thank you. Not for me. Apart from being a bit old, he was also prone to dropping his kaks which could land us in trouble.
Cunny Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 We need a 'Pele', 'Maradona', 'Cruyff', 'Di Stefano' 'type player' in January to have any chance of winning the PL - FACT, (oh yeah plus a quality young centre back). 2000 mil please thank you.
Flanders Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 We need a 'Quasemra' or 'Mancini' 'type player' in January to have any chance of winning the PL - FACT, (oh yeah plus a quality young centre back). 20 mil please thank you.FACT?Hardly. You probably said the same about a 'Torres' at the end of last season. No one player will change our fortunes as much as RB can, it's down to him whether we challenge or not. I think we will.
Cheesecake Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 confidence is the thing we need, it will cost nothing but yet it is priceless.
mathewbet1 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Posted November 2, 2007 FACT yes FACT, dont you know if you say FACT at the end of a sentance it automatically becomes a FACT- FACT.
Cheesecake Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 (edited) FACT = %uck All Correct in This? oops - guess the old blocker doesnt cater for bold fonts - sorry, no offence meant. Edited November 2, 2007 by DPD1973
Red Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 Very annoying and repetitive posting cliche - fact.
Recommended Posts