toffee web

[Mike]

paragraph 7.

 

http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/06-07/comm...16124-Bowes.asp

 

w*nkers.

[Eiler99]

What a f***ing c***.

[Kahnee]

Un-f***in'-believable

[RP]

David Bowes - c***.

[BG]

He's a deluded tosser:

 

"It won't be easy, and it probably won't happen, but if in ten years time Everton are winning championships and cups, regularly entertaining the likes of Barcelona, AC Milan, and Bayern Munich in the Champions League, the ground, wherever it is, Walton, Kirkby, or Timbuktu, will be full every week."

 

I like the "probably"...

[Paul B]

He can't be a Scouser. No-one alive thinks that bilge, surely?

[johngibo YPC]

Yeah, i bet the PR men were rubbing their hands with glee when all those people died

sick b******s who continually use the dead to score points

interesting to see they have an appeal for madeleine on the same page

Maybe we should get some songs going about her at the next derby, see how they react*

 

*i'm clearly not going to do this before you all go mad

[Ramón Benítez Hernández]

What a c unt.

 

I did find the date at the top funny...18/5.

[The Hitman]

Didn't we open up superstores in the Far East selling Hillsborough memorabilia?

I'll bet all those articles in rags such as the S*n and it's ilk following the disaster really inspired new waves of support.

[Stevie H]

What a c unt.

 

I did find the date at the top funny...18/5.

 

just forwarded that to my bluenose ex-boss who is a forumite on there. he's complaining about it.

[Christine]

Same old same old, not sure why anyone is the slightest bit surprised.

[matty]

What an utter bellend.

[andyc]

How can they even print hat sh**e? cretins!

[cymrococh]

He can't be a Scouser. No-one alive thinks that bilge, surely?

May I say that when Everton were successful in the eighties, there were as many blue souvenir shirts in towns in my part of the world as there were red ones.

[Guest Greasy Belcher]

What a silly little piece of writting that was. I think the guys a fool. Claiming that United are succesful because of the munich disaster is equally as offensive. The fact he feels Arsenal did not need a public bout of sympathy because they had alwasy been contenders.

 

I cant wait for the next instalment of the guys writting. Where he explains how Nottingham Forrest and Leed United fell from the top echelons of the english footballing elite due to the fact did not orchestrate massive bouts of public sympathy by capitalising on disaster rebound factor. Also the bit where he predicts the rise of Bradford on the anniversary of the fire. The guy deserves a boot up the hole. His ignorance is more offensive than his stupidity.

[matty]

By his logic Torino should be the biggest club in the world.

[Guest sniffer]

What a silly little piece of writting that was. I think the guys a fool. Claiming that United are succesful because of the munich disaster is equally as offensive. The fact he feels Arsenal did not need a public bout of sympathy because they had alwasy been contenders.

 

I cant wait for the next instalment of the guys writting. Where he explains how Nottingham Forrest and Leed United fell from the top echelons of the english footballing elite due to the fact did not orchestrate massive bouts of public sympathy by capitalising on disaster rebound factor. Also the bit where he predicts the rise of Bradford on the anniversary of the fire. The guy deserves a boot up the hole. His ignorance is more offensive than his stupidity.

 

The only part of that which has some semblance of truth is the reference to Man Utd. Munich didn't make them successful. It DID, however, bring a surge of support across the country which is still with us today.

[Stevie H]

The only part of that which has some semblance of truth is the reference to Man Utd. Munich didn't make them successful. It DID, however, bring a surge of support across the country which is still with us today.

cobblers.

[Mike]

dunno stevie. manu were not a massive team before that.

wolves were possibly the biggest side in the country in the 50's.

[R A Softlad]

I responded:

 

"re: Paragraph 7 of the article "The leaving of Liverpool"

 

Simply repeating an anti-history for Hillsborough and Heysel doesn't make it so. This pathetic revisionist propaganda does no just to you, your club or it's fans."

 

Enough said.

[JohnnyH]

cobblers.

 

My mother keeps an eye for Man Utd for the sole reason of the Munich air disaster. There's nothing wrong with it and of course there was a surge of sympathy for the club and people of Liverpool after Hillsborough. However, for these c**** to suggest the club used it as a marketing ploy is total rubbish and a shocking thing to say.

Edited May 18, 2007 by JohnnyH

[JonShar]

I responded:

 

"re: Paragraph 7 of the article "The leaving of Liverpool"

 

Simply repeating an anti-history for Hillsborough and Heysel doesn't make it so. This pathetic revisionist propaganda does no just to you, your club or it's fans."

 

Enough said.

 

You're much nicer than I am.

 

I wrote "You're a bunch of bitter c*nts who can't sink any lower after that Hillsborough comment - go be an Editor and edit that article."

[MickeyDocs]

Surely this article is libellous!

 

What an a******!!!!!!!

 

Just how BITTER can one p***k be?

[Behind Enemy Lines]

dunno stevie. manu were not a massive team before that.

wolves were possibly the biggest side in the country in the 50's.

no possibly about it

[johngibo YPC]

they are all mad

just been on the forum

some fella said they should sign Joe Cole, and it took until post 8 for someone to say they probably wouldn't get him!!