Mark Viduka

[Guest Kev]

Worth a crack ?

 

A forward that is actually pretty decent in a penalty area.

[Maldini]

only because he fills it.

[Guest Kev]

only because he fills it.

 

[Guest Portly]

I don't think we need Viduka. He's slow and he's getting on a bit. He occasionally has a tremendous game, like when he scored 4 against us for Leeds. On balance, though, I would say Fowler is better.

[Guest Cardie]

We already have one striker who's footballing brain is working at a higher rate than his body.

[San Diego Red]

He is quite good in the box but he weighs 400 kg He won't last very long and Gareth Horsefaced Southgate said he's not for sale. He resembles V. Nistelrooy doesn't he?

Edited December 29, 2006 by KPatel

[Jacko]

I rate Viduka but he's very injury prone so I don't think it would be worth it.

[Tosh]

poor man's Ronaldo

 

(ie, he eats cheaper pies)

[Foo]

only because he fills it.

 

 

So true we should buy him , bwhaha.