Jonesy15 Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 From the post City to sign LFC stadium lease Sep 4 2006 Exclusive By Larry Neild, Daily Post CITY politicians are set to lease a slice of historic Stanley Park, paving the way for work to start on a new stadium for Liverpool FC early in 2007. It means the club could host the first game at its new home at the start of the 2009 season, a report to Liverpool City Council's executive board reveals. The board will meet on Friday to make the landmark decision that will trigger the biggest-ever regeneration programme in north Liverpool, worth more than £240m. The next few weeks will be critical as LFC officials put together a financial package that will fund the club's £180m contribution to the project. That will trigger funding from the public sector worth millions of pounds before a deadline set for the end of this month. Story continues ADVERTISEMENT Sources at the city council close to the deal are confident the funding package will be in place before the deadline. Despite more than 400 objections from individual residents and organisations, the executive board is being recommended to agree to release land in Stanley Park for the new football stadium. Liverpool FC will be granted a 999-year lease, with the area managed by a new joint venture company set up on a 50-50 basis with the city council. The club will pay the city council £300,000 a year ground rent. This week's expected support for the strategy will finally test the threat of opponents who say they will legally challenge what they claim is a sell-off of open spaces and parkland. A programme outlined in a report to the council's executive board envisages a start on the new stadium early next year. Full planning permission for the stadium has already been granted, leaving the park deal the last major hurdle to face. Club officials are expected to satisfy European Objective 1 funding monitors within weeks that money is in place to pay for the new ground. That will trigger the release of £15m to pay for public works around the new stadium. A total of £40m - including European funds - in public sector cash is expected. Councillors have been issued with a 640-page report outlining the arrangements for what is described as the New Anfield. Three leading executive board members, Cllrs Mike Storey, Berni Turner and Keith Turner, have worked alongside acting regeneration chief Ben Dolan, on the strategy. Cllr Storey will be making a presentation to the executive board at the town hall on Friday morning, seeking approval from his cabinet colleagues. A yes vote from the cabinet will pave the way for: * Granting of a 999-year lease for the site of the proposed new stadium; * Design and restoration work for Stanley Park and the Gladstone Conservatory; * Demolition of the 1960s Vernon Sangster sports centre in Stanley Park. City council leader Cllr Warren Bradley said last night: "Liverpool Football Club is one of the best known and most successful clubs in the world. "Yet it stands in one of the poorest areas, not only in the city, but in the country. "What we are looking to do is not just provide a new home for the football club fitting for their status as one of the world's best, but use their success to spark a dramatic revival of the Anfield and Breckfield areas. "For the past five years, we have worked with the Anfield Breckfield Partnership Forum on the strategy to regenerate the area and every consultation with the local community has shown overwhelming support for this scheme. "There have been some objections to the loss of open space and clearly we will consider these very carefully before making any decisions. "However, this is a golden opportunity for North Liverpool to be transformed." Liverpool FC's chief executive Rick Parry said: "We are committed to the regeneration of the Anfield Breckfield area and intend that our investment in a new stadium benefits this neighbourhood and Liverpool." Cllr Storey said last night: "The new stadium will provide a 21st-century business and tourist destination and a catalyst for the regeneration of the wider areas. "The entire project will be delivered between 2006 and 2010." The aim is to carry out the New Anfield Project in three phases. The first stage will see the building of the new stadium as well as a Community Partnership Centre. The remainder of Grade II listed Stanley Park, one of the country's recognised Victorian parks, will be restored to its former glory. That work will include the refurbishment of the Stanley Conservatory. Phase 2 will see the refurbishment of the adjoining Anfield Cemetery. Phase 3 will see the creation of Anfield Plaza on the site of the old ground. It will include spaces for businesses, retail and leisure. The development will be led by the new joint venture company which will have two directors each from the city council and the club. The company will be responsible for the regeneration of the area covering the stadium, as well as the new Anfield Plaza, but will have no influence over the remainder of Stanley Park. Officials at the council say the regeneration scheme and new stadium will create more than 1,000 new jobs, 766 full -time and 260 jobs in construction work. The number of tourists flocking to Anfield will rise from the current 480,000 a year to 1.74m. The city council will take charge of public sector funds, dependent on Liverpool FC confirming private sector investment. The new Community Partnership Centre will have facilities for education, sport and community activities. larryneild@dailypost.co.uk Timetable for action * SEPTEMBER 8 - Council Executive Board to vote on releasing Stanley Park for new stadium * End of September - Final decision on public sector funding * Spring 2007 - Work starts on new stadium * May 2007 - Vernon Sangster centre demolished * Spring 2009 - Work on new stadium finished and handed over to club * August 2009 - First match at new stadium * December 2009 - Existing Anfield stadium demolished * May 2010 - Building of New Anfield Plaza on site of old ground The sparkling new Anfield will hold 60,000 spectators THE new stadium will increase Anfield's capacity by 15,000 to 60,000. There will be an underground car park, club shop and museum as well as the Community Partnership centre. Extensive CCTV systems will be installed, making the areas around the stadium, the new Plaza and Stanley Park safer. Liverpool FC will pay an annual ground rent of £300,000, increasing in line with inflation. The football club will be allowed to use part of Stanley Park to store excavated soil from the new stadium for 18 months. Liverpool FC has ruled out developing the existing stadium or moving to a new site in Speke. Properties in Anfield Road will have to be cleared to make way for the stadium. They are already owned by either the club or the city council. Three council tenants in Anfield Court are to be given priority for relocation.
Cunny Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 don't see why the other thread was closed as the Post story about leasing land and a lack of investment seem unrelated to me. there is nothing in the Post story to suggest our search for investment/funding is over
johngibo YPC Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 (edited) i'd love to know how they get them tourism figures Edited September 4, 2006 by johngibo YPC
Cunny Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 i'd love to know how they get them tourism figures like all projects in all businesses they are plucked out of thin air
monkey puzzle Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 i'd love to know how they get them tourism figures Probably based loosely on numbers of tickets sent to 'non-Liverpool' addresses and the numbers of people who go through the museum/stadium tour. They can then make a rough stab at how many more OOTer's will attend the new stadium and how many more tours etc can be fitted in. All guess work I'd imagine.
Guest old-scallywag Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 This bit gives me a lump in the throat just thinking about it. * December 2009 - Existing Anfield stadium demolished
Andy @ Allerton Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 I'll be gutted if we do move. Just not right at all. Another s***ty soulless bowl to join the many s***holes in the league like Arsenal, Sunderland, Bolton, Leicester, Man City etc. etc. etc. Total s****.
monkey puzzle Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 (edited) Only City out of that lot have not been relegated since moving to their new ground. Arsenal too but they only moved in last week. Edited September 4, 2006 by monkey puzzle
Gunga Din Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 (edited) I'll be gutted if we do move. Just not right at all. Another s***ty soulless bowl to join the many s***holes in the league like Arsenal, Sunderland, Bolton, Leicester, Man City etc. etc. etc. Total s****. i'd rather play n a "s***ty soulless bowl" and be competing at the very top year on year, rather than playing at Anfield watching Man U and Ansenal win al the top prizes, while we sit back in the hope of getting a genius manager who can win us things on a shoestring budget, as teams with bigger stadia rake in the cash Edited September 4, 2006 by big wayne
Woodsyla Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 I just noticed the figure. £60m being invested from outside sources for the whole regeneration of the Anfield area. No wonder we were fighting tooth and nail and jumping through hoops to satisfy the NWDA etc. I have to congratulate Rick Parry on a job well done here. So many people tried to stop this going ahead but his (and the boards) persistance and unwilingness to contemplate a groundshare has made this happen.
melia Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 Another s***ty soulless bowl to join the many s***holes in the league like Arsenal, Sunderland, Bolton, Leicester, Man City etc. etc. etc. You don't know that. Do you think that the Liverpool supporters will allow their team to play in a 'soulless bowl'? No, instead I expect the home fans to turn the new ground into a true representation of their support and the club. Miserable get.
fyds Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 investment. why can't we get any? Secret of good comedy, Mike - ti ming! I'll be gutted if we do move. Just not right at all. Another s***ty soulless bowl to join the many s***holes in the league like Arsenal, Sunderland, Bolton, Leicester, Man City etc. etc. etc. Total s****.It's only a s***ty soulless bowl if those that occupy its seats make it so.
Guest Paris 81 Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 (edited) It's the fans that make a stadium, hence why the likes of Derby, Southampton, Borough, etc, all have souless bowls. Edited September 4, 2006 by Paris 81
Barnesy_10 Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 You don't know that. Do you think that the Liverpool supporters will allow their team to play in a 'soulless bowl'? No, instead I expect the home fans to turn the new ground into a true representation of their support and the club. Miserable get. Anfield is a 'soulless bowl' for 99% of recent matches... Unless its a game against ManUre or Everton or a major Euro game then its quiet as f***, embarassingly so at times, so why won't a new stadium be even quieter? Might even itself out with there being another 10-15,000 people in it. If they demolish Anfield I hope they auction off a load of stuff like the seats etc. Though weren't Arsenal going to do that until they found that there was a dangerous chemical found in the plastic which meant it was illegal to sell on?
Woodsyla Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 If they demolish Anfield I hope they auction off a load of stuff like the seats etc. It would be cool if they let season ticket holders purchase their own seat. I'd buy my seat as a memento.
fyds Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 Anfield is a 'soulless bowl' for 99% of recent matches... Unless its a game against ManUre or Everton or a major Euro game then its quiet as f***, embarassingly so at times, so why won't a new stadium be even quieter? Might even itself out with there being another 10-15,000 people in it. If they demolish Anfield I hope they auction off a load of stuff like the seats etc. Though weren't Arsenal going to do that until they found that there was a dangerous chemical found in the plastic which meant it was illegal to sell on? Apparently there are plans to lack at selling of mementos of the old stadium to benefit several local charities according to the OLSC, but nothing fleshed out yet, which is hardly surprising so early in proceedings.
Guest Paris 81 Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 They should have an auction as they'd make a fortune.
fyds Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 It would be cool if they let season ticket holders purchase their own seat. I'd buy my seat as a memento.I can see us all now sitting at home posting on YNWA while sitting on cutomised computer chairs made from seats in the Kop, Centenary, Moan Stand and Anny Road
Andy @ Allerton Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 It's only a s***ty soulless bowl if those that occupy its seats make it so. Some of the grounds that now have soulless bowls used to be hotbeds of footballing passion and noise. Didn't Sunderlands old ground, for instance, used to have an amazing atmosphere? Now it's a half empty s***hole of a ground. Depending on how things go I might let my Season Ticket go - it's just not Anfield is it? But I'll make that decision after I've seen it.
trowie Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 Anfield is probably becoming a souless bowl due to the supporters ageing quicker than the stadium itself. Unless there is additional capacity, new younger supporters will be lost to other attractions due to not being able to get tickets and we will be left with a dwindling geriatric support as you find in the main stand around me. Having said that I am one of those geriatrics and would love to give it my all as I used to when on the kop. Problem is my croaking off key voice is a cause of embarrassment when I'm the only one giving forth.Get some new blood into the areas that matter.Having said that the lack of a recognised 'ultra' end in the stadium is a cause of concern
fyds Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 Some of the grounds that now have soulless bowls used to be hotbeds of footballing passion and noise. Didn't Sunderlands old ground, for instance, used to have an amazing atmosphere? Now it's a half empty s***hole of a ground. Depending on how things go I might let my Season Ticket go - it's just not Anfield is it? But I'll make that decision after I've seen it.Roker park was a toilet, filled to capacity it held 35,000 once seats went in - hardly surprising in a town about 1/3rd the size of Liverpool they couldn't fill it. And lets be honest Andy, when did Sunderland last boast a season ticket waiting list than runs into decades? When did they last win the CL, the league, The fA Cup, the league Cup, the UEFA Cup - anything? I'll tell you - 1973. Comparing the fact that Sunderland, a second tier team for so long once had a 'Roker Roar' in a tiny ground and now [play in a stadium that was based on them becoming a big team to the advent of current FA Cup and recent CL holders Liverpool, who ARE a world size team and club is just daft.
Andy Mac Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 I'll be gutted if we do move. Just not right at all. Another s***ty soulless bowl to join the many s***holes in the league like Arsenal, Sunderland, Bolton, Leicester, Man City etc. etc. etc. Total s****. Luddite !
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now