Keita Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 Just watching channel 442 us against the mancs, what a lovely little player Ray Houghton was, totally underrated in my view. Runs alll day, lovely little engine. always busy. Could of done with him recently.
moptop46 Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 Como Setas said: Just watching channel 442 us against the mancs, what a lovely little player Ray Houghton was, totally underrated in my view. Runs alll day, lovely little engine. always busy. Could of done with him recently. Is a c"nt always will be c"nt
Guest Paris 81 Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 He was my favourite player while he was here, a real tough little terrier, up and down all game. Great signing by the King.
Benitez Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 moptop46 said: Is a c"nt always will be c"nt you are really odd.
muleskinner Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 moptop46 said: Is a c"nt always will be c"nt One of the 4 that was possibly the best midfield this league has ever seen.
Guest Portly Posted September 2, 2006 Posted September 2, 2006 Never rated Houghton myself. I thought he was one of those players who appears busy but doesn't often actually make much of an impact.
Guest Portly Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 Not at all - I think the stars of the past are very much viewed through rose-coloured glasses. That's because most people on the forum are a lot younger than me, and didn't sit through 90 minutes of these past heroes week after week! I don't want to upset people by pointing out that former players had feet of clay, but they all had their off-days.
Paul Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 Decent enough player but often frustrating. Many a time he'd get himself into good positions but would ruin it with his atrocious shooting. As for his co-commentating skills, does he ever stop moaning?
meredithmathieson Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 Wasn't it Houghton who ballooned over a shot at the Kop end with a few minutes to go against Arsenal at Anfield in THAT game in 1989, which would have made it 1:1 and the League would have been ours?
cestrianred Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 In that game V the Mancs (on ESPN) just watch Barnes, he was majestic, one of the best players I've ever seen between 97-99.
muleskinner Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 I would be interested to hear who people think we should have bought at that time instead of Houghton. If he was as bad as some make out surely that team would not have performed as well as it did?
Scally Bob Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 Houghton was a good player but he wasn't outstanding. He was playing with outstanding players though and he was a vital part of the side at times. He could be inconsistent and give the ball away a bit but he had an eye for a pass, scored some important goals (at the Pit in the Cup!) and usually worked very hard for the team. And he wasn't part of the best midfield four either. That was in 1978-79.
smithdown Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 (edited) Scally Bob said: scored some important goals (at the Pit in the Cup!) Gerrin! Cracking day that was, it was on me birthday (I think). Our end went foookin delirious when he nodded that one in. Edited September 3, 2006 by smithdown
SkippyjonJones Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 smithdown said: Remember his debut when he came off the bench at Wimbledon, picked it up deep and took them all on, a couple of lucky bobbles and then he was through to finish. Camera cuts to Liverpool bench where everyone was stood applauding except for Johnston. though that was the one were beasent and the defender both went for the ball on the edge of the box and got each other instead... houghton went past them and put it in the net. not sure about the bench bit - think that was the year a record crowd was set - 19,000 at plough lane.... anyway it was a bit manic when he scored - certainly not a time for checking out who was doing what on the bench...
floyd Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 Scally Bob said: And he wasn't part of the best midfield four either. That was in 1978-79.Correct. Never mind midfield, other parts of that team weren't bad either. They were on ESPN yesterday, 3-1 beating of the Mancs at Anfield on 25th Feb 1978. 1 Ray Clemence 2 Phil Neal 3 Tommy Smith 4 Phil Thompson 5 Ray Kennedy 6 Emlyn Hughes 7 Kenny Dalglish 8 Graeme Souness 9 Steve Heighway 10 David Fairclough 11 Terry McDermott
Scally Bob Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 floyd said: Correct. Never mind midfield, other parts of that team weren't bad either. They were on ESPN yesterday, 3-1 beating of the Mancs at Anfield on 25th Feb 1978. 1 Ray Clemence 2 Phil Neal 3 Tommy Smith 4 Phil Thompson 5 Ray Kennedy 6 Emlyn Hughes 7 Kenny Dalglish 8 Graeme Souness 9 Steve Heighway 10 David Fairclough 11 Terry McDermott The finest team we've ever had IMO.
John am Rhein Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 Scally Bob said: The team the following season was in my opinion the best-ever side That's my opinion too.
Cunny Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 Scally Bob said: Houghton was a good player but he wasn't outstanding. He was playing with outstanding players though and he was a vital part of the side at times. He could be inconsistent and give the ball away a bit but he had an eye for a pass, scored some important goals (at the Pit in the Cup!) and usually worked very hard for the team. And he wasn't part of the best midfield four either. That was in 1978-79. as somone who is old enough to have watched that team in the flesh week in week out I agree 100% with that appraisal of Houghton
Nebraska Red Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 QUOTE(Scally Bob @ Sep 3 2006, 13:53) Houghton was a good player but he wasn't outstanding. He was playing with outstanding players though and he was a vital part of the side at times. He could be inconsistent and give the ball away a bit but he had an eye for a pass, scored some important goals (at the Pit in the Cup!) and usually worked very hard for the team. And he wasn't part of the best midfield four either. That was in 1978-79. agree with all of that. he was the type of player who would go missing during a game and appear to take a 10-15 minute break, he would then pop up with something decent. he was sometimes as infuriating as Garcia is today with his play, but he was always a vital part of the team and we seemed to miss him when he did not play.
passater Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 (edited) There was a lot of talk in Ireland at the time that Souness didn't like Irish players, hence the sudden departures of Houghton and Staunton for no obvious reason and with no ready-made replacements of the same quality. Houghton was a cog in a machine. He couldn't be the 'main man' and demonstrated this for Ireland on occasions when key central midfielders were absent (one of the Spain away games comes to mind). Likewise, when McCarthy played him n central midfield as the 'playmaker' late on in his career when he was at Palace. He wasn't up to it. Edited September 4, 2006 by passater
Raj Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 passater said: There was a lot of talk in Ireland at the time that Souness didn't like Irish players, hence the sudden departures of Houghton and Staunton for no obvious reason and with no ready-made replacements of the same quality. Houghton was a cog in a machine. He couldn't be the 'main man' and demonstrated this for Ireland on occasions when key central midfielders were absent (one of the Spain away games comes to mind). Likewise, when McCarthy played him n central midfield as the 'playmaker' late on in his career when he was at Palace. He wasn't up to it. Really? My understanding is that Souness had to sell Staunton and Houghton because of the limit of foreign players in European competition. We could only field 3 non-UK players, hence this shift. There may be other issues, but this would have been a primary factor
Poolfrog Posted September 4, 2006 Posted September 4, 2006 fred milne said: However, he was by some distance the worst player in that 4. When we signed Houghton, Craig Johnston simply retired. He didn't fancy being second string to a clearly inferior Houghton - and who could blame him?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now