Jump to content
I will no longer be developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Probably a bit late on this, but im told today that viduka is was being looked at as a cheap option for us upfront!

 

Very strange move for me, I mean on his day hes not a bad player, but hes a lazy b*****d who would loose interest after a few games.

 

 

The only other thing he mentioned was that mark hughes said today that hes very worried about loosing bellamy. No official aproaches from anyone as of yet but he isnt to optomistic they will be able to keep him

 

Oh, and mckay still reckons bent is our no 1 target

Edited by ricflairandy
Posted

I mentioned last summer that he'd be good for us. He's a fat b*****d but an excellent player.

He'd do what morienties does except he'd score as well and wouldn't get knocked off the ball.

Posted

Probably a bit late on this, but im told today that viduka is was being looked at as a cheap option for us upfront!

 

Very strange move for me, I mean on his day hes not a bad player, but hes a lazy b*****d who would loose interest after a few games.

The only other thing he mentioned was that mark hughes said today that hes very worried about loosing bellamy. No official aproaches from anyone as of yet but he isnt to optomistic they will be able to keep him

 

Oh, and mckay still reckons bent is our no 1 target

 

 

Who is HE-pardon my ignorance?

Guest Cardie
Posted

Fat b*****d.

 

1.5 million wasted if we signed him.

Guest AdamS
Posted

Who is HE-pardon my ignorance?

Australian centre forward

Posted

For the relative pittance he'd cost Viduka is a reasonable option. Arguably he's good back-up for Crouch, in that he's strong and can hold the ball up well.

 

If it meant we could spend money on better players elsewhere, I wouldn't be gutted to see Viduka and Bellamy replace Cisse and Moro.

Guest Cardie
Posted (edited)

For the relative pittance he'd cost

 

1.5 million plus another 2 or more in wages for a year.

 

What then, no re-sale value so we've wasted 3.5 million pounds on a quick fix, at best he leaves after a year and at worse we can't get rid and have to pay another 2 million next year.

Edited by Cardie
Posted

Viduka is about as fat as Lampard or Ronaldo

 

If he was fat he wouldn't be playing for Boro or the Aussies

 

Not that I would like us to sign him

Guest Sabre
Posted

I think he'd be good. He gets the piss ripped out of him but he would rise to the challenge of playing in such a good team - incredibly skilful and a good finisher.

Guest Cally77
Posted (edited)

He's not even fat for start, he's just a big strong lad. An absolute bargain for 1.5 mill. He's Intelligent, skillful, brings others into play and capable of coming up with something out of nothing.

 

Why people turn their noses up at good experienced players like this is beyond me.

Edited by Cally77
Guest AdamS
Posted

Well in my experience the fat ones always try harder.

Posted

remembering he is playing for a successful middlesborough team that got to the finals of the eufa cup some stats ...

 

... Total Appearances 26

... Starts 18

... Substituted 9

... Total Minutes Played 1582

... Avg Minutes Played Per Start 87.89

... Goals 7

... Avg Mins Played/Goal Scored 226

... Goals Scored As Sub 0

 

cisse, who most of you insist is not good enough, manages to score a goal every 191 minutes ... fowler and bellamy bag one about every 155 minutes. this is the twilight of viduka's career imo, and with heavy wages and no real sell on fee i think the money could be better spent elsewhere.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...