I really don't think we're that far from Hodgson levels this season. I know that's likely to invoke some sort of backlash, but let's look at it. Exactly the same number of points at this stage of the season. Out of the league cup after insipid home display Scraped through UEFA Cup group stages We're basically in the same position, "result wise", as we were then. It was deemed nowhere near good enough for Hodgson, and I can't see why it would be good enough now. To me it's about perception. Hodgson was viewed as being out of his depth, archaic, not up to speed. Rodgers is viewed as young, dynamic, "has ideas". Ultimately the football is just as unproductive and results have been just as bad. He's also spent £30M and none of them have been a success or are even deemed to merit a place in the team. We were pretty dire in the second half of last season league-wise, but I think the focus had shifted towards the cups. This wasn't deemed good enough last year, so using it as any sort of barometer for this year is risky. We should have improved markedly on last year with £30M spent on the team. Results have been dire, we haven't beaten a genuinely good team in the league all season and I see no improvement on the horizon. We've had 31 games. We're half way through the league season. We're in serious bother.