However, in response to AWGs point, the study did take steps to account for the contingencies AWG has mentioned. In other words they haven't just said "oh, Liverpool should have had a penalty in the 63rd minute so let's change that draw to a win"
From what I've just read, it seems that he's being entirely sensible about it all so I withdraw what I said earlier about him being precious as it looks like I wrongly thought that he'd been whinging about it.
Readers of tabloids in massive hypocrisy shock Look, I don't really care that much but I'd say that reporting on how the England squad is preparing for their next game is PRECISELY their job
Again, it's not their job "to help England". Ok, if a journalist became aware of photographs taken with long lenses that showed Kane injured, you would expect them not to write about that?
Well given that they're journalists I'd expect them to want a scoop over wanting England to do well. I think Southgate needs to stop being so precious. They aren't his friends or cheerleaders. How far do you take this? If someone spotted evidence that Harry Kane was injured would you expect them to sit on that info as well?