magic melia

God loves the optimist

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

After reading that im joining Stressed Eric on that walk outside

Doesnt question the owners

Its difficult to read through blind fury

So what will happen in the next 4 weeks that will enlighten the manager , Put your own stamp on your team as the manager and take the plaudits or the bullets but stop shrugging your shoulders Roy

As manager of our club i want him to succeed , But when asked if Torres prefers someone along side and his answer is " I honestly dont know " it doesnt fill me with confidence

We have just been described as nothing special , Its only because its before the watershed that they cant say we are sh*te on T,V

Cant believe what i just heard . Does Torres prefer to have someone play along side and Roy answered i honestly dont know

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Bring a tin hat for this match Smithdown

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Parlour married his wife Karen in 1998; the couple had three children before separating in 2001. In July 2004, they agreed a divorce settlement which awarded Karen Parlour two houses and a £250,000 lump sum but the issue of maintenance was not agreed. Ray Parlour offered Karen £120,000 p.a. on the basis that this would meet all of her and their children's needs, but she wanted more. Initially the court awarded her £212,500 a year, but both parties were unsatisfied with this and appealed. The Court of Appeal increased Karen's award to £440,000 p.a. However, this would only be paid for five years to enable her to put aside £250,000 each year to build up her own capital resources. The case brought with it media speculation that future divorce cases would bring people a more equal share in their former partner's future earnings, and a possible increased usage of prenuptial agreements Its the future earnings thats got the sting in the tail , You lose half now and continue to keep losing

And thanks to Ray Parlours divorce so can Coleen

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.