Just to be clear, I don’t want this Super League because of what it means for Liverpool and the PL (which I like warts and all). But I think you’re being way too dismissive of what it could be and how resilient the member clubs are.
The 12 clubs have positioned this way for a reason. First, let’s face it - the product is going to be plenty good. F1 is a good product if you like motor racing, the NBA is a good product if you like basketball. I wasn’t the slightest bit worried that Haas can’t be relegated when watching the grand prix this weekend. The best players playing against each other in a sport you like usually means a good product.
Second, most viewers are casual viewers in the broader context. I don’t want Liverpool (or our PL competitors) in a Super League, but as a casual La Liga/Serie A/Bundesliga viewer, in a vacuum, I actually wouldn’t mind a super league of those 3 leagues if I’m being honest. I actually would prefer to watch Barcelona, Real, and Atletico play each other loads of times rather than watch Eibar vs. Elche. I am sure someone in Germany is thinking the same thing about the Premier League/La Liga/Serie A and so on.
And therein lies the problem. The structure that is being proposed is probably going to be really effective in capturing casual viewers, which is where the money is. And the reality is that most of us are casual viewers outside of one or two clubs and the league(s) they play in. This is going to be much trickier to stop than just “choke them until they’re desperate”.
I don’t see any of those clubs being brought to their knees. Realistically this ends with the 6 English clubs with more power than ever, either because they actually go though with the Super League or because they get offered a lot to not do it. This power asymmetry is the logical conclusion of the premier league/champions league setup.