Kindred

Possibly. Though maybe not in an advanced midfield role. Either would have led to starting 4 out of 6 in their usual positions rather than just 2 though.

Only on the basis that in the first half very few were at their normal match level. That may have been partly due to only 2 of the usual front 6 being in their usual positions. If Gruijic could have done a job for an hour it could have led to the front 3 and hendo being in their usual positions maybe leading to a little more fluency in our game, which only came after the Lallana sub which led to more players being in their usual positions. Gruijic was the option on the bench so presumably the closest to making it than anyone else.

We seemed to start the game with only 2 of our form front 6 in their regular positions (Hendo & Mane). Easy in hindsight but perhaps it may have been better to give Gruijic the game instead of Sturridge, even if just for an hour prior to Lallana coming on. That could have given us 4 of that 6 in their regular positions from the start. Obviously our game changed when Lallana came on, but that moved the players from the 2 out of 6 to 5 out of 6, with Countinho & Firmino moving as well and our fluency began to emerge. Arguing against myself slightly now I was surprised that Can didn't take the central more holding midfield role and hendo pushed further forward. I think that may have helped more in the first half as Lallana leads the press and I think Hendo is better equiped to play that role than Can, as he doesn't seem to quite have the same mobility and speed.

He spoke about that in the PC after the game. He asked for his name to not be sung whilst the game is ongoing. He thinks it's akin to celebrating a win before the game is over. He'd rather the team gets all the support. Think it's partly on the back of the Arsenal game when he was over exuberant in his celebrations when we got the fourth goal which he admonished himself for afterwards.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

I would imagine that Lovren came up for discussion during the summer 'review' and the question was asked why we've spent so much money on him for him to not play and then perform as expected. Rodgers was possibly told he couldn't sell him and replace him so had to 'rehabilitate' him. Keeping that in mind and also the fact that we were always going to need a bare minimum of 3-4 central defenders throughout the season, he took the decision to back him from the start to try to boost his confidence. He wasn't too bad during the first three games, but has fallen back today. It will be interesting to see what happens next.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

On the assumption that we actually sign those we seem most heavily linked with and looking at the potential squad next season, I've been wondering whether we may see more of 3-4-3 going forward and the dalliance with it in the first half at Fulham was something of a testing ground for some of the current players. Admittedly the first half wasn't so great, so it obviously would need work! If no one is sold/loaned out (bound to be one or two on loan at least), we could have up to 7/8 central defenders and something of a paucity of fullbacks with only really Johnson & Enrique as genuine established players (with non heavily linked so far). If it's more of a midfield position, there are perhaps other options there as back up (Downing left, Henderson right, for example). It's perhaps a little easier to ease in the younger central defenders too with more cover. The potential benefits could be a little less pressure on the defence, particularly in possession and also maybe on Lucas in midfield in covering them. It encourages more width and attacking play from Johnson & Enrique playing a more wide midfield role. It also may lead to encouraging more interplay amongst the front three (who could be a little closer together, not having to provide so much width) with Gerrard more able to join in from midfield as well. Anyway, just a thought!

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Ahead of Sunday's home date with West Brom, Dalglish said: "I was asked to come back here and it was an honour and a privilege to do so. There was no hesitation in my decision, and if I was asked again tomorrow, I would do exactly the same thing. "For me, the aim was to move the club forward and that is what we're all trying to do to the best of our ability. "But if the progress stops, then something else needs to be looked at. "Where the line is going to be drawn, I don't know. I am sure that everyone will have set different targets that they would see as being progress. "But the most important people here are the people who own the football club, and the people who support the football club. "I think they will be better judges than anyone else." Dalglish added: "I don't know whether winning the Carling Cup and reaching the FA Cup final means we have been successful. "People have to judge for themselves and if they still want to batter me that's also up to them. "It doesn't matter what happens to Kenny Dalglish. All that matters is Liverpool Football Club. As long as this club doesn't suffer, then that's okay with me. I'll just come into work every day, work as hard as I can and live up to my responsibilities, and we will see what happens from there." My link

Assuming they both develop, I think shelvey could become a more dynamic player, grabbing the headlines with goals, but Henderson will in time become as influential and appreciated as Lucas has now become, as he seems a proper intelligent pass and move player.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.