fyds

As if they were learning quickly and not afriad to admit they may have jumped the gun.

What;s his 'address' and is Tom Werner on their too?

He's English isn't he? Can't possibly be his fault....

Kenny - unless Pelligrini is still open maybe. But Kenny would get in there and light fires under their arses - he'd get us playing.

Could we not very politely email JH and TW? We have to make our feelings clear and known. Christ knows I hope so.

Smiling as well. Great. Fantastic.

No more time, really just sack him - do it now. Kenny sitting behind JH and TW must have been in agony watching that.

Get Kenny in - get him in now.

Can we please sack this dopey, useless, ineffective c*nt now please?

Nope - owners they may have been, a majority on the board they did not have. They will have to pay the lot.

I'd be stunned if the council would allow us to stay and expand markedly as it clashes with their own plans for the area, plans we were signed up to. We need at least 15-20k on the stadium - I don't see how we'll get that staying put - plus facilities etc. But hey...who knows.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZHEkU__Ijw&feature=fvst

Dear John Henry and NESV folk, If you're reading this - and I've no doubt someone in your well-run organisation will find us soon if they haven't already, please put Roy out of our misery. In buying the club - especially in the way you did, you've given us all a lift - now please lift the whole show by losing Roy and appointing Kenny Dalglish as his successor - if you like, as a caretaker until summer when it can all be reviewed, but please - do it soon and finish part one of the job you've started. Many thanks, Us lot. P.S. Most of us would not mind the eventual reinstatement of that nice Mr Benitez - I suspect he wouldn't be adverse to such a move either.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

It's going on a shirt, that.

I might be a sad, middle aged tw*t - but at least I'm a recognised internet terrorist!

None, zilch, nada - not at all. The best they could hope for is to sue for damages - which they would pretty much certainly lose as the court has already ruled against them twice and for the people they would be suing and with some strength, even so far as awarding costs against G&H. They're done.

Dear Tom, Wasn't it?

That is certainly true No - because i don't believe it is a conspiracy, just a general overview - a lazy overview. If you became Head of Sky Sports you could sort it out, if you cared about it, if you noticed it, if you believed it worth bothering with. Absolute nuetrality across the board.

I can appreciate that cheap approach on the big subjects, CP such as the takeover - but their coverage of us is pretty much uniformly negative whether a big or small issue.

You construct it as a conspiracy, which I didn't - it's not necessary - it can be seen as an overview - the same way certain papers allow regular areticles about perceived theiving scousers, self-pity city and so on. It doesn't have to be a conspiracy or policy - just an accepted overview.

I don't think it's a conspiracy, I just don't think they like us - as to why - maybe because we cost a sister newspaper of theirs several million over the years? Who knows.

I don't believe it is from LFCTV - why do you think it is? This was done yesterday when Hicks was no longer an owner CC.