Don't think anyone has said that they want him back. More just a case of acknowledging that he was, and still is, a good player. Although his goal scoring record wasn't great for us (about 5 in 20, around 10 of which were starts I think) I seem to recall a few stories about other players being surprised he wasn't kept on. At the same time, I honestly don't recall any specific stories about his 'd****ead tendencies being his downfall' other than a vague, tenuous tale about one of his brothers acting the big b******s around the place, getting his feet well under the table as a DJ at Baby Blue and generally being a c***. I think McAlister's phrase in the proggy yesterday was that the player himself was 'good as gold' at Anfield. Maybe that wasn't the case, and I know he was detested at City, but someone will need to enlighten me if so. If we'd bought better to replace him he'd be long forgotten. As it was, I struggle to imagine that he would have done worse for us (in any way) than that c***sucker Diouf. No point crying over spilt milk though, and I certainly think there were worse decisions made around that time than not bringing Anelka in, as good player that he is he has done nothing since to suggest that he would have lived up to his talent.