They have the most amazing memories for every decision that's ever gone against them but absolutely no recollection whatsoever for decisions that the ref got wrong in their favour. I heard one accusation from a Bluenose that we can't name a ref who gave a bad decision against us in a derby and that proves that they didn't happen (he'd conveniently forgotten the Hibbert/Fellani challenges). They don't seem to realise that we don't actually bother storing this information! Odd incidents perhaps - e.g. didn't they equalize from a corner that should have been a goal kick last season? But I can seldom remember who was in charge. I wonder sometimes though if it's less short memories and more of a mind-set that's been encouraged from the very top of the organisation. If you can deflect blame and focus attention elsewhere then fewer questions get asked of those in charge and directly responsible. Kenwright pulls the stunt off perfectly. When he's being asked difficult question he will frequently stick something negative in about us to focus wrath in our direction (the recent "TopShop" comment took the biscuit). And who better to focus attention away from poor players, poor tactics and poor performance than the ref? Listen to them go on about the failed Champions League qualifier and they all believe they were robbed by the ref. No mention of the fact that over two legs the better team won and that only a stunning performance from their keeper kept the scoreline in the away leg from being embarrassing. What's even sadder is that, while they spend all the time whinging and focussed on us and the refs, their chairman is making David Moores look competent and the Stoke's of this world are passing them by.