Woodsyla

It was far more serious than tripping the ref and he got 7 so here's 3 more. Perfectly logical.

They have nailed him to the wall based on the fact that they gave some lad an extra 3 games for tripping a ref. Ignoring all other incidents that may or may not have had any bearing on the outcome they focussed solely on this completely unrelated incident. It's a f***ing show. We should have battered them for this.

Almost a dissimilar as Another such case was of Ashley Barnes, of Brighton & Hove Albion, who was charged after tripping the Referee in March 2013 at Brighton & Hove Albion’s match against Bolton Wanderers. On that occasion, the Regulatory Commission found that the standard punishment was insufficient and decided to award a further three-match suspension, making a total of six-match suspension (in addition to one extra match suspension for his second dismissal of the season)

I am staggered we haven't appealed this.

It makes perfect sense and is fair and balanced until point 80 when they throw the book at him. In 10 words trip referee is seven games ban so biting is ten

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

It's too f***ing late for this s*** now

Then you are f***ing mental. Suarez is f***ing great, bring it on, all of it. I'd go through this every season if it meant Suarez was still a red. He's got 32 games, he will still score 20 goals. f*** them all

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

That's sounds about right but I don't think either Lucas or Gerrard have the legs for that system. You need a Mascherano type in there for that to work.

Very true

I've heard many people talk of the having the back 4 on a piece of string, our back 4 play on a piece of elastic.

Why are you so angry at the 2, oh go on then I'll give you the 3rd call it a dubiious bellend panel verdict, people who called him a spoofer over 2 months ago? It don't make no sense. I have learnt one thing though today, don't speculate on a figure in a post on here, accuracy is the most important thing. f*** the point you are trying to make, you'd better make sure the numbers stack up, because on an internet fora where people chat s*** during work, off the cuff guesses are clearly the realm of the madman.

Any recent examples, no thought not, the usual CL sidestep of the question he can't answer in action. Yep, one of them is AE saying he has a nagging feeling that BR is a spoofer and Mike two posts later says 'He's a spoofer'. It's hardly a lynch mob but there you go, those bellends have been told.

BINGO. Well said Brendan

No, I'm tired of your tedious bulls*** laying into people who don't believe that Rodgers is the 'one'. Getting slated for saying winning 3 games in 8 is not a good little run even if we don't get beaten. I have very high standards for the custodian of LFC and not living up to those does not make a manager a spoofer but it doesn't mean he should have got the job. I meant recent as in 'What is the f***ing point of your snide attitude against things people posted on the internet last year'. Clear now.

AE's post? "Maybe its the wrong time to post this as we are losing, but I just can't shake the feeling that Rodgers is a spoofer. Maybe its just his inexpirence and his willingness to make friends with the press, but it's been nagging me for most of the season. I want to be wrong and support the manager unconditionally, but i just can't shake this nagging feeling." Hardly calling him a spoofer. Saying he has his doubts.

I clicked on two links that went to Mike's post. Any recent ones?

2 from February have been posted, is that recent, not really as it is nearly May. Yes 6 months was actually 4 months, how wrong of me. Why are you so angry at something people said last year? Any recent ones?

Do you have any recent posts of people calling him a spoofer?

It's dull and it's wrong, he's not a spoofer, he's good at his job.

So the two you showed me five minutes ago and 4 more from 4 months ago. I said 6 months, I'm sorry it was actually 4 months ago. Got any recent ones then?

That's not the point, the point is the way Carralegend describes you would think there is this massed rank of posters who think Rodgers is a spoofer. It just isn't true.

So Mike and Cocknose, that's it, knowing Mike he is probably taking the piss. So 'some of the bellends' is one person. You're directing this assault at a single person then who calls himself 'cocknose'. Get stuck in lad.

Who are these people you keep referencing? I haven't seen anyone say he is a spoofer for about 6 months at least. Yep, it's up to Ayre to be billy big balls and take on the FA, that's not Brendan's job.