Elm0
-
Posts
694 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Articles
Blogs
Marketplace
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Elm0
-
Depends how bottomless our pit of money is.
-
Elated to see Wickham move elsewhere at that price. Extortionate.
-
Shawcross isnt a hyypia. Hyypia was good on the ball too.
-
How on earth did we miss out on Marveaux?
-
Why are people here dissing Andy Carroll already
Elm0 replied to baja the hut 's topic in Liverpool FC
It seems I have a rival in floral language. Fear not, I am on the case! -
what can i say? youve got me.
-
*additional surprises
-
Fair enough, dont disagree but wouldnt mind one or two surprises in there instead of the obvious.
-
Youve basically just compiled a list of the strongest rumours there.
-
thats not what ive been told
-
24, aggressive, strong, quick. not an agger on the ball, but then who is?
-
*waits for hate to arrive on the doorstep of everyone else who isnt bothered*
-
they both arrive at the club as squad players. its not an unreasonable definition.
-
i was throwing that type of player under the "squad player" bracket.
-
You see....looking at that team and it highlights the problem we're in. That team is pretty darned good in all honesty, but that leaves us in the awkward situation whereby anyone that actually improve it will either be a world renowned player, or they wont be interested in coming. Theres not much we can do bar sign squad players.
-
Referring specifically to posts like this Carraman. Thats a completely different general consensus to what was being said a few weeks ago by the majority.
-
im glad some sense has been seen by the masses regarding our transfer policy. if things pan out how the main rumours suggest next season will be very interesting indeed.
-
I didnt get giddy.
-
I think we can assume that list is a load of poop. No Walcott? Lennon?
-
no idea, but as someone above said this has been going on for years. if they didnt like i doubt theyd keep bringing them out.
-
More a few seasons back. ie, its standing fare.
-
this is a bit of trim, it isnt a massive component nor the main colour. Similarly its not the same shade as everton's, not even remotely close. it cant compare to a white stripe, because white comes in one shade. Man City's new away kit, with markedly more red than there is blue on our shirt. Thats also the away kit so will get a lot more airtime than this, being a third kit. i dont see a problem with a light blue trim.
-
no, im saying theres a massive difference between a little bit of light blue trim thats markedly different from the everton shade and a full kit made solidly of the everton shade.
-
5 year olds can be intelligent, but they are usually immature. with immaturity comes petty tribalism, which is seemingly what the hate of a blue trim is all about. its not really obvious to me what a light blue trim cant be in our third kit. Can you clarify this?
-
thats a load of balls. havent used the word "thick" in this thread at all. i gave my opinion, people tried to make out it was odd, i explained further. who said id be fine with a solid blue kit? Havent said that at all, but if you want to glean that from what ive said then go ahead. Massive difference between a bit of light blue trim and a full everton blue shade. If you cant see that I suggest going to your local B&Q and asking for a dulex colour palette. dont be silly.