Because you cant say he wasted money without looking at how much he brought in to cover those sales. Thats a bit of a silly really. You have to try and be slightly more objective. Its not as much of a problem if you cover your losses, no, because that means a player has been bought, utilised in the interim and then sold near profit effectively giving the club a free player for that period of time. Youve got to keep in mind that each player is not going to work out - that happens for every manager, so its very harsh to criticise on that front given that his record was no worse than anyone elses. As time went on and on the more Rafa had to sell to buy. Do you see the correlation there? Overall I think a lot of people seem to forget that the squad that Rafa left was markedly better than that left by Houllier 5 years previously, and Id be very happy to state that more good things than bad things came from the transfers of Rafa.