To draw some parallels with a recent business deal that made the news here in Oz this year - a certain high profile Aussie businessman made an announcement that he had agreed a record coal deal with a certain Chinese company (Govt backed), they came out the next day and denied any dealings or involvement. It was later clarified that the deal was being done via a different 3rd party company (also Chinese govt backed). Thus the originally named Chinese company was not incorrect in its denials of a deal and the Oz businessman wasn't entirely incorrect either as they were essentially the same client just acting through different companies (both essentially the Chinese Govt). Maybe this is the case here