sutty

Moot point really.

I'm f***ing fuming about that one. I mean, the lino there is over ruling the ref. They've got f***ing mikes on. Why werent they talking rather than him stopping play? I don't know what Moss does once he goes back to the lino if he doesnt uphold the lino's over rule. The VVD one. I can see why the ref gives that as a pen, even if he gets it wrong. If Moss gives it, I could kind of deal with it. I cannot see how the liner does. That is not his decision to give at all. He's a mile away to over rule the ref. I don't think I've been as angry about a refereeing decision for years. Even the Webb/Suarez series didnt make me this angry because at least he was consistent.

The mad thing about that is the conversation should have been "are you telling me Kane was offside". When the answer is yes then Moss can just give the offside call. The really mad thing is that the easy decision to give is the right one. The harder one is the one he actually gives.

Your commitment to us signing welsh lads even when they're absolute s***e is admirable Go on, say Robson-Kanu and Sam Voakes.

Indeed. He is attempting to play the ball off balance and on the stretch because Kane is behind him. Yes he makes an absolute s*** show of the clearance, but he has to play it because Kane is there. Are we in a state of play now where if you goal hang and play long balls and the it flicks off the top of a defenders head as they try to head it then you're onside? That is a step back to the rule about 50 years ago which was changed because it was f***ing stupid.

It's bananas that whole thing. If that penalty is correctly being given, then the rule is an absolute f***ing farce. If it isnt, the officiating is a farce.

f***ing fuming about this still. Both the f***ing pens. As if Wanyama does that. All of it.

Slightly weird, felt like he needed a goal last night and WBA. Given how many he's scored, he's looked a bit like he's needed one. Might be me projecting but wasnt surprised to see him grabbing the ball for the pen.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

I cannot believe you are arguing about this. Well I can. But I also can't.

I know, was just speculating. Interesting to price him up.

Ah right. Yeah he's great. How much is his transfer fee do you reckon? About a billion.

Are you talking about Sterling there? Odd shout. I like him alot as a player but he's not that.

Should still have beaten them even that notwithstanding.

Its not even how good or bad they were though Gomez was poor I thought. It was more that we had absolutely no need for fullbacks

It's bananas that Gomez and Robbo were on the pitch at 75 at 1-0, never mind at the final whistle.

f*** off reds

He's an advanced 10.

The Konch was crap, but I felt a bit sorry for him. Hodgey used to hook him when we were crap, which was lots just to curry favour with the crowd. Anyway, the competition to slag off Si the most extremely is dull.

Even he himself is subject to the algorithm. Gets a crap team. Then a mediocre team. Then a big job. Repeat. He is the algorithm.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

That's the line that is being walked and the gamble that Klopp appears willing to take. It's interesting how you price it.

I'd get a forward. Not a replacement for Phil. I don't think we need to replace Coutinho like for like. We do need 1 more good one across the front 3. Is Lemar that?